It is spring of 2025 and the world as we knew it has shifted beneath our feet. As I wrote last week, the United States, once a stronghold of free trade, has retreated into a fortress of protectionism, leaving its neighbors and allies to navigate treacherous economic waters. For Atlantic Canada, this seismic shift presents both peril and possibility, particularly in the developing renewable energy sector.

We must now confront a fundamental tension that is the pull between our ideals of sustainable progress and the harsh realities of geopolitical power plays. How do we reconcile our aspirations for a clean energy future with the immediate pressures of economic survival? This is not merely an academic question, but one that cuts to the very heart of our identity as a region and as a people in Atlantic Canada. In this time of uncertainty, we have an opportunity to redefine ourselves. To forge a new path that is both principled and pragmatic. To transform challenge into triumph. But to do so, we must first understand the landscape before us and arm ourselves with the tools to navigate it.

Let us, then, establish our guiding principles for this new era:

Embrace Our Expertise - In the face of U.S. tariffs and global trade upheaval, we must recognize that our greatest asset is our specialized knowledge. Atlantic Canada possesses world-class expertise in renewable energy, particularly in wind and tidal power. We are innovators at the forefront of the clean energy revolution. We will no longer position ourselves as just another option in the global marketplace. Instead, we will declare our unparalleled expertise in harnessing the power of our coasts and winds. We will set the terms of engagement, not as desperate sellers, but as sought-after partners in the transition to a sustainable future.

Diversify Our Markets - The United States' shift towards protectionism is not an end point, but a call for diversification. We will no longer be held to a single market, no matter how vast or convenient. We will aggressively pursue new partnerships in Europe and Asia, leveraging our strategic location and renewable resources. 

Innovate in Collaboration - In times of geopolitical turmoil, the temptation is to retreat inward. We reject this isolationist impulse. Instead, we will double down on collaboration—across provinces, across sectors, and across borders. We will establish Atlantic Canada as a sector for renewable energy integration, inviting global partners to join us in solving the challenges of intermittency and storage. Our membership in the Global Offshore Wind Alliance is not just a badge of honor, but a platform for transformative partnerships.

Lead with Value, Not Price - In a world of tariffs and trade barriers, competing on price alone is a race to the bottom. Instead, we will compete on value—the unique benefits we bring to our partners and customers. We will articulate our value with clarity and conviction. Our renewable energy solutions are not commodities, but strategic assets that offer energy security, environmental stewardship, and economic resilience. We will price our offerings based on the long-term value we create, not short-term market fluctuations.

Embrace the Cognitive Revolution - The challenges we face are not merely economic or technological—they are fundamentally about how we think. We must undergo a cognitive revolution, reimagining our place in the global energy landscape. We will cultivate a mindset that sees beyond immediate obstacles to long-term opportunities. We will invest in education and training that prepares our workforce not just for the jobs of today, but for the challenges of tomorrow. Our goal is not merely to adapt to change, but to drive it.

As we implement these principles, we must acknowledge the emotional weight of our task. The uncertainty of our times can be paralyzing. The fear of making the wrong move in a volatile geopolitical landscape is real and valid. But we must not let this fear dictate our actions. Instead, let us draw strength from our shared purpose. Let us find courage in the knowledge that our work is not just economically necessary, but morally imperative. We are not just building businesses; we are crafting a sustainable future for generations to come.

In practical terms, this means:

1. Investing heavily in research and development to maintain our technological edge in renewable energy.

2. Cultivating deep relationships with decision-makers in potential new markets, particularly in Europe and Asia.

3. Creating cross-sector task forces to rapidly prototype and scale new clean energy solutions.

4. Developing sophisticated value-based pricing models that capture the full worth of our offerings.

5. Implementing continuous learning programs that keep our workforce at the cutting edge of energy innovation.

As we navigate all this, we must remember that our greatest asset is not our natural resources, but our human capital—our creativity, our resilience, our commitment to progress. The geopolitical uncertainties of 2025 are not obstacles to be overcome, but opportunities to be seized.

"There is harmony in the tension of opposites, as in the case of the bow and lyre." ~Heraclitus

How do we reconcile our ideals with the harsh realities of our time? The answer, I believe, lies in the very tension between these forces. It is in grappling with this tension—between aspiration and pragmatism, between local needs and global dynamics—that we will forge our path forward. Let us meet this moment not with fear, but with fierce determination. Not with hesitation, but with bold action.

The cognitive revolution begins now. The energy revolution starts here. Atlantic Canada, it's time to lead the way. ∎

Well, as of yesterday (April 2, 2025) the markets are rendering their verdict and reality is finally sinking in. 

In the theatre of global economics, the United States has always been a lead actor. But lately, it's been improvising its lines, leaving the rest of the cast scrambling to adapt. The real economic threat isn't just the tariffs themselves. The unpredictability of U.S. trade decisions has also become a destabilizing force, undermining decades of established international relationships and threatening economic stability worldwide.

When you don't know what's coming next, you can't plan. And when you can't plan, you can't invest. It's that simple.

The erratic nature of U.S. trade policy has created a business environment where certainty—that precious commodity every investor craves—has become as rare as a straightforward statesmanship political speech. Companies aren't just paying tariffs; they're paying the premium of perpetual contingency planning.

This isn't a partisan observation and both American administrations, Republican and Democrat, have contributed to trade policy whiplash. The difference is in style, not substance. One administration swings the hammer openly while another applies pressure more subtly. The result is the same: trading partners who can no longer rely on America's word.

Atlantic Canada

For Atlantic Canada, this unpredictability hits particularly hard. Our region doesn't have the economic mass to absorb shocks the way other Canadian business and industrial centres might.

The seafood industry, a cornerstone of Atlantic Canada's economy, has been riding this roller coaster for years. One moment, lobster exports flow freely; the next, they face punitive duties. It's not just about paying more. It's about not knowing whether to hire that extra staff, invest in that new equipment, or expand into that new market.

Forestry products have faced similar challenges. The softwood lumber dispute, a seemingly eternal trade irritant, has seen duties appear, disappear, and reappear with frustrating irregularity. This isn't trade policy; it's trade roulette.

Renewable Energy

Perhaps nowhere is the impact of this uncertainty more evident than in Atlantic Canada's developing renewable energy sector. We're sitting on a goldmine of potential with world-class wind resources, tidal energy opportunities, and a skilled workforce eager to build the green economy of tomorrow.

But renewable energy requires long-term investment horizons. When U.S. policy on clean technology can shift with each election cycle, investors get nervous. Atlantic Canada's renewable energy companies aren't just competing globally. They're competing against uncertainty itself. Every project faces an additional risk premium when the rules for the market could change at any moment.

Certainty as Competitive Advantage

So what's the solution? For Atlantic Canadian businesses, it means diversification, not just of markets but of risk. It means building resilience into business models and expecting the unexpected.

For policymakers, it means recognizing that trade agreements aren't just about tariff levels. They're about creating frameworks that can withstand political cycles. The best trade deal isn't necessarily the one with the lowest tariffs. It's the one that will still be honored five years from now.

And for our American friends and partners, it means understanding that their greatest contribution to global economic stability isn't necessarily a particular trade policy. It's consistency. Predictable partners make better trading partners, regardless of which party holds power.

The tariffs themselves will always be negotiable. What's harder to recover is trust in the stability of the system. In today's global economy, unpredictability is the real tariff, and it's one that everyone pays, regardless of which side of the border they're on.

When we know the rules of the game, even if they're not entirely in our favor, we can at least develop a strategy. But when the rulebook keeps changing mid-play, everyone loses. And for regions like Atlantic Canada, with economies built on international trade, that's a game we can't afford. ∎

There comes a point in every energy conversation when someone asks "But what if the political winds shift?" This question reveals much about the current understanding of market realities and suggests a misinterpretation of how value operates in the renewable sector.

The recent and incredibly rapid rightward political movement across many Western democracies has become a common narrative for those considering the future of energy policy, especially in regard to the United States. Here in Canada, the Liberal resurgence (reaching 40.7% nationally as of March 2025) demonstrates something more nuanced than ideological shifts. This comeback draws strength from nationalism and economic sovereignty concerns—particularly in response to new disruptive American policies. This isn't simply about left versus right. It's about who shapes the energy narrative going forward.

Energy Expansion vs Transition

The language we use significantly influences how we approach challenges. For some time, our industry has operated within the frame of "energy transition"—a perspective that often positions renewables as disruptors and conventional carbon-based resources as the incumbent being disrupted. This framing limits our thinking. What we're experiencing could be better understood as an expansion. The global energy demand isn't static; it's growing. And in Atlantic Canada, we're not necessarily replacing one energy source with another—we're expanding our capabilities, our sovereignty, and our economic potential.

When speaking with those who focus on the transition narrative, it's worth considering "would stakeholders respond better to managing a challenging transition, or leading a valuable expansion?" The distinction matters. Energy expansion positions renewables not as replacements but as additions to our energy portfolio. It moves beyond the perceived choice between economic growth and sustainability. It shifts the conversation from limitation to opportunity. This isn't just about semantics—it's about strategic positioning that influences how decision-makers and the public perceive value.

Atlantic Canada's Unique Positioning

The political shifts we're witnessing may actually strengthen Atlantic Canada's renewable energy position, not weaken it. 

America's new emphasis on energy independence creates a parallel opportunity for Canada to assert its own energy sovereignty. Atlantic Canada, with our established renewable infrastructure, becomes not just environmentally valuable but strategically essential. Our renewable resources aren't just "green"—they're domestic, reliable, and more resistant to foreign supply disruptions.

The rightward political shift has brought renewed focus on economic security. Atlantic Canada's diverse energy portfolio—alongside traditional sources—positions us not as ideological purists but as practical diversifiers. This aligns well with conservative economic principles of risk management and resilience.

Nova Scotia's energy achievements, including reducing coal dependency while maintaining rate stability, demonstrate how Atlantic Canada can lead without becoming entangled in polarizing energy rhetoric. When we position our renewable technologies as innovations rather than ideological statements, we appeal across the political spectrum. Conservative governments have proven receptive to technological leadership narratives, supporting the development of small modular reactors alongside renewable expansion.

The conservative emphasis on reducing dependency on foreign manufacturing creates a perfect opening for Atlantic Canada. By positioning our renewable sector as part of a domestic supply chain solution, we align with priorities across the political spectrum. 

The Opportunity

The renewable sector sometimes misinterprets conservative perspectives on energy. This represents a missed opportunity. Most conservatives support addressing climate change but with different emphases that deserve consideration:

• Technology solutions including carbon capture, nuclear energy, and fusion

• Energy security and domestic resource development

• Supply chain independence

• Streamlined permitting for all energy infrastructure

This isn't opposition to climate action—it's a different approach with different priorities. For Atlantic Canada's 37,700 energy sector workers, the expansion model offers a more inclusive vision than transition rhetoric.

Atlantic Canada's Distinctive Market Position

When considering how political shifts specifically impact Atlantic Canada's renewable sector, several unique advantages emerge. Unlike other regions where renewables operate in isolation, Atlantic Canada's geographic concentration allows for integrated resource planning that transcends provincial boundaries. Nova Scotia's leadership in areas such as tidal energy exemplifies how specialized expertise creates market protection regardless of political climate. While wind and solar face commoditization pressures, tidal energy remains a specialized field where Atlantic Canada holds recognized expertise. If we as a region can figure out how to harness this energy, that specialization insulates us from both political headwinds and market competition.

The rural character of much of Atlantic Canada—often seen as an economic challenge—becomes a renewable energy advantage. Our abundant land for wind development, shallow continental shelf, and distributed population creates ideal conditions for renewable deployment that serves local needs while generating exportable surplus.

The Path Forward for Atlantic Canada

For Atlantic Canada's energy sector specifically, the path forward includes:

• Positioning our renewable expertise as a matter of sovereignty, not just sustainability

• Developing manufacturing and supply chain capabilities that address conservative concerns about foreign dependencies

• Emphasizing how our renewable sector creates rural economic opportunities—a priority across the political spectrum

• Leveraging our specialized knowledge in areas like offshore wind and tidal energy to establish strong market positions

• Creating targeted training programs for conventional energy workers to participate in sector expansion

• Advocating for regulatory reforms that benefit all energy development

The political landscape matters, but Atlantic Canada's distinctive renewable profile and strategic positioning matter more. By understanding these dynamics, our region can navigate and even benefit from political shifts while creating lasting value in the energy marketplace. ∎

You've read Forster's "The Machine Stops." If you haven't, stop reading this and go read it now. I'll wait. It's the eerily prescient tale of a future where humans live in isolated cells, communicate only through screens, and have forgotten how to live in the physical world.

Back? Good.

Written in 1909, this short story predicts our screen-addicted lives with uncomfortable accuracy. People living in isolated pods, communicating through screens, worshipping technology, forgetting how to touch each other. Sound familiar?

The Ideology Behind the Machine

Forster's ideology in this story is clear: surrender your autonomy to technology, and you surrender your humanity.

What's fascinating is how we've collectively nodded at this warning for over a century while simultaneously racing toward the very future Forster feared. We're not living underground in isolated hexagonal rooms (yet), but we're getting closer every day.

The story's protagonist, Kuno, commits the ultimate sin: he wants direct experience. He wants to see the surface of the Earth with his own eyes, not through a screen. He wants to feel the wind on his face.

In 2025, wanting direct experience is still revolutionary. We've built our own version of the Machine – a complex web of AI, social media, and digital infrastructure that mediates our experiences. We don't call it the Machine. We call it progress.

The pain comes from seeing how we've positioned ourselves in relation to our technology. We've given away our power. We've surrendered our authority. We've become supplicants to systems we barely understand.

Positioning Yourself Against the Machine

In life, positioning is so important – how you become and remain unique. Kuno positioned himself against the Machine. He said no. He exhibited backbone. He stood up for himself.

In today's world, with AI advancing rapidly and political systems shifting like quicksand, positioning yourself against technological determinism is harder than ever. The U.S. and Russia suddenly voting the same way at the UN? AI becoming your "teammate" across business functions? These developments would have been science fiction just a few years ago.

Yet here we are, watching as the Machine evolves, not into a single monolithic system but into a thousand interconnected ones.

The Strategy of Resistance

Strategy is a concise high-level approach to achieving an objective by applying strengths against weaknesses in a surprising way.

Kuno's strategy was simple: escape. Touch the earth. Breathe unfiltered air.

What's your strategy? How will you maintain your humanity as AI continues its march into every aspect of life? How will you resist the pull toward mediated experience?

I don't have a twelve-step program for you. I don't have a framework or a model. All models are wrong. Some are useful.

What I do have is a question: What direct experiences are you sacrificing on the altar of convenience? Perhaps it's turning off notifications for an hour each day. Maybe it's having dinner conversations without phones at the table. Or simply walking outside without checking your caloric burn or step count.

No Surprise, No Information

Information is surprise. No surprise, no information.

The most surprising thing about "The Machine Stops" is not how accurately it predicted video calls, social media, and our screen addiction. The most surprising thing is that we read it, nod sagely, and then go right back to building the Machine.

When the Machine finally stops in Forster's story, civilization collapses. People have forgotten how to live without it. They've forgotten how to fix it. They've forgotten they created it in the first place.

That's the real warning. Not that technology will isolate us (though it will). Not that we'll worship it as a god (though we might). The real warning is that we'll forget we have a choice.

You always have a choice. You can step outside. You can touch grass. You can have a conversation without a screen between you.

You can, in your own small way, stop the Machine.

Or at least remember that you built it. And what we build, we can unbuild.

The choice is yours. Choose wisely. Start today—close this screen when you're done reading and look at something real. ∎

Economic storms reveal where foundations are weak. The U.S. threat of sweeping tariffs (25% on Canadian goods, 10% on energy) isn't just a trade shock. It's a stress test for Atlantic Canada's renewable energy ambitions. This potential disruption exposes three critical truths about our region's clean energy landscape.

First, threats expose fragility. Our renewable projects rely significantly on integrated North American supply chains, particularly for certain components and materials. The proposed tariffs could inflate costs for certain critical components like U.S. made inverters or racking systems by 25% overnight, potentially leading to delayed timelines, squeezed margins, and investor hesitation. Specialty steels and rare earth imports are vulnerable to geopolitical disruptions. Proposed U.S. tariffs on Canadian critical minerals (e.g., tungsten, indium) could strain turbine manufacturing. These vulnerabilities highlight the need for a more resilient local industry.

Second, interdependence cuts both ways. New England, for example, depends on Canada for close to 10% of its electricity and over $10 billion in annual energy trade. Canadian electricity exports power to nearly 6 million U.S. homes, with a high concentration in New England states. Tariffs here risk cascading price hikes there — a self-inflicted wound for U.S. climate goals. Yet this codependency also creates leverage, offering a potential bargaining chip in negotiations.

Third, adversity fuels reinvention. When cross-border trade stumbles, local solutions often sprint. Canada now has the impetus to streamline interprovincial clean power corridors, onshore manufacturing, and critical mineral partnerships.

The pivot lies in betting on reciprocity and building bridges, not moats. Every tariff has a mirror. Let's channel retaliation into resilience, for example: tax breaks for Canadian-made components, fast-tracked grid upgrades, and procurement policies favoring homegrown tech. Position renewable energy not as a vendor of electrons, but as an expert partner in continental energy security. Now is the time to turn trade anxiety into ambition. We need to be building systems so robust that even tariffs (or Trump) can't shake them. ∎

Atlantic Canada is on the verge of an incredible renewable energy opportunity. With the Atlantic Economic Council projecting an optimistic $7 billion offshore wind market by 2030 (a figure reflecting potential construction value and 5,000 initial jobs), our region is poised for transformative growth. Yet a fundamental challenge threatens to slow this momentum: securing reliable buyers for the substantial power these wind projects will generate.

Recent conversations I've had with developers consistently highlight a mismatch between development plans and market readiness. Atlantic Canada's fragmented electricity markets and limited inter-regional transmission capacity have constrained renewable energy development, while our emerging offshore wind sector lacks the established market structures seen in more mature regions like the North Sea.

Three main factors shape our current market:

1. Transmission infrastructure remains insufficient for transporting large volumes of wind-generated electricity to higher-demand regions.

2. Canada's evolving regulatory environment for offshore wind creates uncertainty for potential buyers and investors seeking long-term commitment security.

3. Our region's relatively low local electricity demand requires creative solutions for power utilization and export.

Phased Approach

To address these challenges effectively, we must consider multiple strategic approaches. Government support through incentives such as tax credits, renewable energy certificates, feed-in tariffs, or contracts for difference could help make projects economically viable. Equally important is the need for long-term political and financial commitment from the provincial and federal governments to create an environment that attracts investors and provides the certainty that developers require. A streamlined, predictable regulatory regime with efficient permitting processes will further boost developer confidence.

When we analyze the implications of these challenges, we can see that the mismatch between development timelines and offtake availability poses a risk to Atlantic Canada's emerging industry. This situation could potentially discourage development, as investors and developers naturally require certainty about revenue streams before committing billions of dollars to projects. A key challenge before us lies in bridging the gap between the current lack of offtake and the industry's promising future potential.

The region needs a methodical approach across strategic phases, each building upon the success of its predecessor.

• Laying the Groundwork (2025-2028) - The success of Atlantic Canada's offshore wind sector hinges on getting the fundamentals right. During these formative early years, we must focus on establishing clear, investor-friendly regulations that eliminate uncertainty and streamline development processes. This period is now well underway but still requires significant infrastructure investment, particularly in upgrading our ports and strengthening our transmission capabilities. We can't overlook the wealth of expertise already present in our region's conventional offshore sector. By intentionally developing local supply chains that leverage this knowledge, we'll create lasting economic benefits for our communities. Throughout this phase, maintaining open dialogue with Indigenous communities, fishing industry representatives, and local stakeholders isn't just good practice—it's essential for building trust and addressing concerns before they become obstacles.

• Proving the Concept (2028-2032) - With our foundation in place, we should be ready to move from planning to action. A modest project (such as the planned 300-400MW Nova East project) will serve as a proving ground, allowing us to tackle technical challenges unique to Atlantic Canada's marine environment. This initial project will primarily feed into Nova Scotia's grid, helping phase out coal-fired generation. This phase may also involve integration of green hydrogen production to test the concept and explore its potential as a flexible offtake option.

• Commercial Scale-Up (2032-2035+) - As we enter the scaling phase, larger commercial ventures will take center stage. Success at this scale requires a diversified approach to power distribution and consumption.

To address the fundamental challenge of power offtake, we need to pursue multiple parallel strategies. We must prioritize integration with Nova Scotia's existing grid, gradually increasing the share of offshore wind power. This requires close partnership with utilities to modernize our grid infrastructure. Simultaneously, scaling up green hydrogen production offers a potential way to use excess power generation.

Regional collaboration will be important. By working with all Atlantic provinces, we can create a unified clean energy market. Looking south, developing transmission infrastructure to the U.S. Northeast could unlock valuable export opportunities through long-term power purchase agreements.

We should also actively court energy-intensive industries, such as data centers, offering them reliable, clean power as an incentive to establish operations in Nova Scotia. Supporting these initiatives with robust energy storage solutions will help manage the intermittent nature of wind power and enhance grid stability.

Path Forward

This measured approach offers several key advantages. By scaling gradually, we can learn and adapt while minimizing risks associated with large-scale development. Diversifying our power distribution strategies protects us from over-reliance on any single solution. Early investment in infrastructure, particularly grid modernization and transmission capabilities, lays the groundwork for future growth and export potential.

Throughout all this, maintaining strong stakeholder relationships remains key. Success will also require supportive policies—whether through tax incentives, renewable energy certificates, or contracts for difference—to ensure project viability in the early stages. Above all, we must remain adaptable, ready to embrace new technologies and opportunities in our rapidly evolving energy landscape. 

This isn't just about managing risk—it's about creating a sustainable industry that will power our region's future while contributing to our clean energy goals. ∎

In project management, culture isn't built through fancy charts or methodologies, but through our everyday reactions. It's an interesting paradox. We carefully plan our scopes and milestones, yet how we respond to unexpected challenges truly defines our project environment.

A Framework for Authentic Project Leadership

Let's break this down into practical principles that you can actually use.

Honesty: Your reaction to mistakes determines information flow. When a team member comes to you with a mistake they've made, your response shapes the future of transparency. How you react decides whether people will bring issues to your attention early (when they're fixable) or hide them until they become disasters. You're not just handling one mistake; you're setting the tone for all future communication.

Autonomy: Your reaction to work styles affects problem-solving. How you respond when someone works unusual hours or takes time to think through a problem isn't about sticking to schedules—it's about trust. This reaction shows whether your team values results or appearances, innovation or conformity. It tells people whether you believe good work happens in one specific way or through individual approaches.

Value: Your pushback against scope creep defines priorities. When you challenge a stakeholder's mid-project "quick addition," you're not just protecting your timeline—you're making a statement about project integrity. This reaction guides your team to prioritize quality and sustainability over people-pleasing and short-term thinking.

Emotion: Your calm during crises creates safety. Staying composed when facing unexpected challenges isn't about looking cool—it's about creating a space where problems can be solved rationally. Your measured reaction gives the team permission to focus on solutions rather than panic, ensuring energy goes toward progress instead of fear.

Fairness: Your balanced reviews encourage improvement. By analyzing both successes and failures objectively, you create room for genuine learning. This approach to project outcomes encourages your team to see both victories and setbacks as valuable insights, rather than reasons for either overconfidence or shame.

Proactive Project Leadership

While these principles highlight the power of reaction, good project leadership requires more. We need to actively shape the environment. Create clear acceptance criteria and protect your team from competing demands. Give team members room to grow while addressing performance issues that threaten success. Connect tasks to meaningful outcomes, fueling motivation.

In taking on both reactive and proactive leadership, we face a truth. Project managers have evolved from administrators to culture builders. It's a responsibility we might not have expected, but one we need to embrace.

The challenge is creating a structure that provides both safety to experiment and clarity to execute—a project environment where smart risks are encouraged, and where setbacks are seen as learning opportunities rather than failures.

Remember that your reactions to missed deadlines, scope changes, and team conflicts aren't just in-the-moment decisions. They're the building blocks of your project culture, influencing how information flows, how problems are solved, and ultimately, how successful your work becomes.

Take a moment to think about your own reaction patterns as a leader. Do they match the project culture you want to create? What behaviors are you unintentionally reinforcing? And most importantly, how can you use the power of reaction to build projects that deliver through a culture of trust, resilience, and shared purpose?

Try bringing this framework to your next project review. Have an honest conversation about the reactive culture you've created. By understanding and purposefully shaping our reactions, we unlock the true potential of our projects and ourselves as leaders. ∎

The recent passage of both federal Bill C-49 and Nova Scotia’s provincial Bill 471 has set a new stage for offshore wind development in the province. These legislative changes have streamlined and clarified the process for consenting offshore wind projects, paving the way for a greener energy future. Now that the regulatory framework is taking shape, what will the process look like in Nova Scotia? 

Pre-Development

The pre-development phase for offshore wind projects in Nova Scotia involves a structured process governed by the newly renamed Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Energy Regulator (CNSOER) and ministerial oversight. In Nova Scotia, the province will initiate a call for bids in 2025, inviting developers to participate. Initially, the CNSOER forms opinions on areas within offshore Nova Scotia that should be opened to Calls for Bids for offshore renewable energy projects. The Regulator then makes an "offshore renewable energy recommendation" to Canada's Minister of Energy and Natural Resources and Nova Scotia's Minister of Natural Resources and Renewables (designated ministers). These ministers subsequently decide whether to adopt the Regulator's recommendation to issue a Call for Bids. Upon ministerial approval, the Call for Bids is issued, and prospective developers submit bids for submerged land licences. The CNSOER evaluates these bids and forms an opinion on which bidder(s), if any, should be successful. The ministers then decide whether to adopt the Regulator's recommendations regarding successful bidders. 

Successful bidders will apply for a single submerged land licence, a simplification from the previous multi-licence system. The process for obtaining a submerged land licence in Nova Scotia involves several key steps. Initially, the CNSOER identifies potential areas suitable for offshore renewable energy development. The regulator then makes recommendations to both designated ministers regarding these areas. If the recommendations are approved, a call for bids is issued for specific areas. Interested companies can then submit their bids for submerged land licences. Following this, the CNSOER evaluates the submitted bids and makes recommendations to the designated ministers. Decisions regarding issuing the calls for bids will require approval from both federal and provincial ministers. This dual-level approval process provides a balanced approach to resource management and development. 

Following ministerial approval, successful bidders are granted submerged land licences that confer rights to develop offshore renewable energy projects in the designated licence areas. While these licences grant development rights, further activity authorizations from the CNSOER will be required before actual offshore renewable energy facilities can be constructed and operated.

Regulatory Phase

The CNSOER will serve as a key component in the approval process for offshore energy projects. This body has undergone a significant expansion of its mandate, now having oversight of offshore renewable energy initiatives alongside its existing responsibilities for petroleum resources. Project proponents will be required to submit their proposals to the CNSOER, which initiates a comprehensive review process. This process aligns with the federal Impact Assessment Act (IAA), as integrated by Bill C-49. The Bill requires the CNSOER to consider impact assessments conducted under the IAA before making determinations on project applications. If an IAA assessment is not triggered (i.e. due to project size or ministerial exemption), the Bill gives the CNSOER discretionary powers to conduct project specific assessments.

The CNSOER's chairperson will provide input to the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (IAAC) on various aspects of the assessment process, including timelines and necessary studies. The impact assessment process will be conducted pursuant to the IAA, with the IAAC playing a key role. The CNSOER will work closely with IAAC, providing comments on project designations, timelines for public input, and necessary studies. Additionally, Bill C-49 gives the CNSOER discretionary powers to conduct regional assessments of cumulative effects from offshore projects and strategic assessments of policies, plans, or programs relevant to offshore energy development. These assessments can be conducted independently or in collaboration with other jurisdictions, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation of potential environmental impacts.

In fulfilling its regulatory responsibilities, the CNSOER will conduct extensive consultations with various stakeholders. These include provincial government officials, Indigenous communities, and other relevant groups, ensuring that a diverse range of perspectives is considered during the decision-making process. An important component of the regulatory phase involves the assessment of safety measures and environmental protection standards. The CNSOER is tasked with evaluating each project's adherence to these requirements, thereby promoting responsible and sustainable development of offshore energy resources.

Project Development Phase

Following successful navigation of the regulatory process and receiving necessary authorizations from the CNSOER, project proponents begin development. This involves selecting appropriate turbine technology based on site conditions, designing foundation systems suited to local seabed characteristics, planning the offshore substation and export cable routes, and developing construction and installation methodologies. The engineering process often involves iterative optimization to balance energy production, costs, and environmental considerations.

A robust supply chain is critical for project success. Developers must secure agreements with turbine manufacturers, foundation fabricators, cable suppliers, and installation vessel operators. In Nova Scotia, this may involve assessing and potentially upgrading local port facilities to support construction and long-term operations. Concurrent with these activities, ongoing stakeholder engagement remains important. This includes continued consultation with fishing communities to minimize impacts, coordination with shipping and navigation interests, engagement with local communities on economic opportunities and visual impacts, and collaboration with First Nation groups on environmental stewardship and benefit-sharing.

Securing project financing represents a major milestone in the development phase. Developers must demonstrate project viability to investors, which is often contingent on obtaining power purchase agreements (PPAs) with utilities or large consumers. The structure of these PPAs can significantly impact project economics. Throughout this period, developers implement environmental monitoring programs as required by regulators. This may include baseline studies on marine mammal populations and migratory birds, underwater noise monitoring during construction activities, and development of mitigation plans for potential impacts.

As the project progresses, detailed planning continues for the construction and installation phase. This involves developing a precise installation schedule accounting for weather windows, coordinating the complex logistics of component delivery and vessel operations, and establishing health and safety protocols for offshore work. Throughout the entire development phase, the CNSOER's oversight continues. Developers must demonstrate ongoing compliance with safety and environmental requirements, submitting regular reports and undergoing inspections as needed.

Key Considerations

The streamlined process emphasizes joint management between federal and provincial authorities, as highlighted in both Bill C-49 and Bill 471. This cooperative approach ensures coordination and efficient decision-making. One of the most significant advantages of the new legislation is the potential for an efficient timeline. The changes are designed to accelerate offshore wind developments, potentially reducing the time from conception to operation.

In a provincially strategic move, Nova Scotia's Bill 471 provides an alternative pathway for development in jointly managed waters. This provision offers an alternative pathway in case of delays in federal processes, demonstrating the province's commitment to advancing its offshore wind sector.

Nova Scotia's Place

Nova Scotia has positioned itself well to capitalize on the economic opportunities presented by offshore renewable energy. The coming years will see the province emerge as a leader in the sector’s development and setting a precedent for other coastal regions across the country. Recent political changes in the U.S. could further our sector advancement here in Atlantic Canada. A change back to a Trump administration could create challenges overall for the North American offshore wind industry, but also opportunity for Atlantic Canada to establish itself as a leader in the sector. President Trump has been a vocal critic of offshore wind, promising to halt projects "on day one" if elected. His administration's energy policies will likely prioritize conventional energy production and reduced environmental regulations, redirecting BOEM's focus away from wind and back towards conventional leases.

Any slowdown in U.S. offshore wind development could indirectly impact Atlantic Canada. But I don't think it's all bad news - if the U.S. steps back from offshore wind, Atlantic Canada should position itself as a North American leader in the industry. By focusing on domestic policy support, attracting international investment, and leveraging the world-class wind resources, we can continue to develop our offshore wind industry regardless of international political shifts. 

The key for Atlantic Canada will be to create a stable, attractive environment for offshore wind development that can buffer changes in the international political landscape. This would involve diversifying markets, bolstering supply chains, investing in necessary infrastructure, and continuing to refine supportive policies and regulations for our industry.

For more of my posts on Nova Scotia's offshore wind, see: here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here. ∎

The recent draft Regional Assessment Report by the Committee for the Regional Assessment of Offshore Wind Development in Nova Scotia was made available to the public for comment on October 31, 2024. This marks a significant milestone in the province's renewable energy development. The comprehensive document provides guidance for the responsible development of offshore wind resources, highlighting both the incredible potential and the complex challenges that lie ahead. 

Key Findings and Recommendations

The draft report identifies eight potential development areas for offshore wind in Nova Scotia, categorized into two tiers.

• Tier 1 areas, recommended for immediate consideration, include Sydney Bight, French Bank, Middle Bank, Sable Island Bank, and Western Emerald Bank.

• Tier 2 areas require additional investigation and are the Misaine Bank, LaHave Basin, and Canso Bank.

This strategic approach allows for a phased development, prioritizing areas with the most promising conditions while allowing time for further research and planning in more complex regions.

The report recommends the establishment of a 25 km buffer zone from the coastline and around Sable Island, where no development should take place, with some potential exceptions. This buffer zone demonstrates a commitment to balancing development with environmental protection and coastal community interests. 

Overall, a series of 34 recommendations are provided across 8 themes to support responsible offshore wind development. The draft report outlines a comprehensive strategy emphasizing the need for robust research, stakeholder engagement, and adaptive management. The recommendations focus on establishing a strong knowledge base through initiatives like the Nova Scotia Offshore Wind Collaborative Research Initiative and creating a centralized data repository. They also stress the importance of addressing socio-economic impacts, including maximizing local economic benefits and developing necessary infrastructure and workforce. The report advocates for clear guidelines in project development, from site selection to decommissioning, and emphasizes the need for coexistence strategies with existing industries, particularly fisheries.

A significant portion of the recommendations revolves around environmental stewardship and governance. This includes developing frameworks for cumulative effects assessment, standardized mitigation measures, and compensation mechanisms for unavoidable impacts. The report calls for a coordinated regulatory framework, transparent processes for project approval, and mechanisms for inter-jurisdictional cooperation. Additionally, it highlights the importance of education and training, recommending the development of programs at various levels to build public awareness and create a skilled workforce for the offshore wind industry. Overall, these recommendations aim to create a balanced approach to offshore wind development that maximizes benefits while minimizing potential negative impacts on the environment and local communities.

The report's timeline projection suggests that the first offshore wind turbines in Nova Scotia are not expected to be installed until sometime after 2030, likely closer to 2035. This extended timeline reflects the complexity of developing a new industry in a region with no prior offshore wind experience.

Challenges and Opportunities

While the potential for offshore wind in Nova Scotia is significant, the sector faces several challenges that are common to emerging offshore wind regions:

Regulatory Framework

One of the primary challenges is the evolving regulatory landscape. New legislation and regulations are still being developed, creating uncertainty for potential developers and stakeholders. This regulatory change, while challenging, also presents an opportunity to create a robust framework that addresses the unique needs of Nova Scotia's marine environment and communities. 

Recent legislative changes, such as Bill 471 (Advancing Nova Scotia Opportunities Act) introduced in September 2024, demonstrate the ongoing development in the regulatory framework. This bill made significant amendments to enable offshore wind development, including changes to the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Resources Accord Implementation (Nova Scotia) Act and the Marine Renewable-energy Act. The province's proactive approach, moving ahead with its own legislation without waiting for the federal Bill C-49, created potential uncertainty about federal-provincial alignment. Now, with Bill C-49 receiving Royal Assent on October 3, 2024, the federal government has solidified its commitment to developing offshore wind, particularly on Canada's East Coast. This new law modernizes the regulatory framework governing offshore projects in Newfoundland and Labrador and Nova Scotia and also signals greater alignment between Canada's energy policies and its ambitious climate goals. 

This legislative milestone is a significant development for the country; however, as with any major new industry, it will have impacts. The task that now faces governments is to ensure this industry maximizes benefits to communities and the environment while minimizing potential harms. The evolving regulatory landscape offers opportunities to create a tailored framework for Nova Scotia's unique marine environment and coastal communities. The ongoing development of regulations allows for the incorporation of provisions for environmental protection, fisheries coexistence, and community benefits. The amendments expanding the mandate of the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board aim to streamline the approval process for offshore renewable energy projects. This evolving framework also provides opportunities for stakeholder input, including Indigenous communities and fishing industry representatives, to shape the regulations.

Environmental Considerations

The environmental considerations for offshore wind development in Nova Scotia are complex. The report highlights numerous potential impacts that require careful evaluation and mitigation. Marine mammals, birds, bats, and other wildlife are of particular concern, with the report emphasizing the need to assess potential disturbances to their habitats and behaviors. For instance, the potential for bird and bat collisions with turbines is a significant issue that requires innovative solutions. Research from other offshore wind markets has shown that certain species, like the black-legged kittiwake, may be particularly vulnerable to collision risks. The report also emphasizes the importance of considering seabed disturbance and impacts on benthic habitats, which could affect the entire marine ecosystem food chain.

Noise and vibrations, particularly during the construction phase, present significant environmental challenges. Studies have shown that pile driving noise can cause behavioral changes in harbour porpoises and seals, potentially displacing them from important habitats. The construction and operation of wind turbines can also lead to increased turbidity, affecting plankton in the water column and potentially disrupting local food webs. Additionally, the installation of undersea cables can have direct effects on the seabed and sediments, potentially altering the abundance and diversity of benthic organisms. 

The report also highlights concerns about visual impacts on coastal viewsheds, particularly near parks and tourism areas, which could have socioeconomic implications. There are potential impacts on commercial fisheries that need to be carefully managed. These complex environmental considerations demonstrate the need for comprehensive environmental impact assessments and long-term monitoring programs to ensure the sustainable development of offshore wind in Nova Scotia's waters.

Socioeconomic Impacts

The offshore wind sector's development will have significant socioeconomic implications for Nova Scotia. Concerns about impacts on commercial fisheries, including Indigenous Treaty rights (particularly fishing rights and potential displacement from traditional fishing grounds), are paramount. Additionally, there are concerns about effects on tourism, recreation, and coastal viewsheds, particularly near parks and popular tourist areas.

However, these challenges also present opportunities for economic diversification and job creation. The development of a skilled labor force and supply chain to support the industry could bring substantial economic benefits to the region. Balancing these potential benefits with the concerns of existing industries and communities will be important for the sector's success.

Infrastructure and Technical Challenges

Nova Scotia currently lacks adequate port infrastructure to support a large-scale offshore wind industry. Upgrading existing ports and potentially developing new facilities will be necessary to accommodate the specialized vessels and equipment required for offshore wind construction and maintenance.

Grid infrastructure limitations pose another significant challenge. The electrical system close to the coastline may not be sufficient to carry large amounts of power from offshore wind farms further into the grid, requiring substantial onshore transmission upgrades. This challenge is compounded by the need to route export cables through complex marine environments while minimizing environmental impacts.

Supply Chain and Manufacturing

The global demand for offshore wind components, particularly submarine cables, is creating supply chain constraints. For Nova Scotia to develop a competitive offshore wind sector, it will need to either integrate into existing supply chains or develop local manufacturing capabilities. This challenge presents an opportunity for economic development but requires significant investment and planning.

Stakeholder Engagement and Social Licence

The report highlights the extensive engagement conducted, including over 120 sessions with Indigenous communities, government agencies, fishing industry representatives, potential developers, and the public. This level of engagement is critical for addressing concerns and building social licence for offshore wind development. Incorporating Indigenous knowledge and perspectives into decision-making processes and ensuring equitable distribution of benefits and impacts across communities are important challenges that must be addressed for the sector's long-term success.

Looking Ahead

Despite these challenges, the outlook for offshore wind development in Nova Scotia remains highly optimistic. The region's strong wind resources, coupled with growing global expertise in offshore wind technology, place Nova Scotia as a significant player in the renewable energy sector. The report's emphasis on adaptive management approaches and ongoing stakeholder engagement provides a framework for addressing challenges as they arise. This flexible approach, combined with the phased development strategy, allows for learning and adjustment as the industry evolves. 

Technological advancements in the offshore wind sector, such as improvements in cable manufacturing and installation techniques, as well as the development of floating wind turbines for deeper waters, offer solutions to some of the current challenges. These innovations could expand the potential development areas and improve project economics over time.

The global push for decarbonization and the increasing cost-competitiveness of offshore wind energy provide a supportive backdrop for the sector's development in Nova Scotia. The province's commitment to renewable energy, as evidenced by this comprehensive assessment, demonstrates a long-term vision that could attract investment and expertise to the region.

As mentioned, the Committee is now inviting public review and comment on the draft report. Commenting is open until 11:59 pm on December 20, 2024. This is an opportunity for stakeholders, including residents, environmental groups, and industry representatives, to provide input on the future of offshore wind energy in the province. Public feedback is essential in shaping a sustainable and balanced approach to renewable energy development in Nova Scotia. Click here to provide your comments. Your insights can help ensure that the province's offshore wind initiatives align with community values and environmental stewardship. 

For more of my posts on Nova Scotia's offshore wind, see here, here, here, here, here, here, and here. ∎

**3 October 2024 UPDATE**

Wow, that was fast! Bill C-49 received Royal Assent yesterday and is now law.

This legislation really is a game-changer for Atlantic Canada's energy sector. It enables Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador to develop offshore renewable energy projects, particularly wind energy, opening up significant economic opportunities, with the potential to attract billions in investments and create thousands of new jobs. 

The bill establishes a joint management regulatory framework, maintaining provincial control over resources while expanding the mandates of existing offshore petroleum boards to include renewable energy regulation. This move not only positions Atlantic Canada to compete in the global offshore wind market but also contributes to Canada's clean energy goals, allowing the region to harness its world-class wind resources for decarbonizing electricity grids and producing clean hydrogen for export.

Things are going to get busy!

Original May 2024 Post

~~~~~~~~~~

The recent passing of Bill C-49 in the House of Commons on May 29th represents a pivotal moment for the development of offshore renewable energy projects, particularly offshore wind, in Atlantic Canada. This landmark legislation prepares the way for the region to harness its offshore wind potential, positioning it as a leader in the energy expansion towards a clean energy future. At the heart of Bill C-49 lies the expansion of the mandate of the offshore petroleum regulators in Newfoundland & Labrador and Nova Scotia. 

These regulatory bodies, previously focused solely on offshore petroleum activities, will also have the authority to oversee and regulate offshore renewable energy projects, including wind projects. This broadened mandate is an important step in establishing a comprehensive regulatory framework for the responsible development of offshore wind energy. It ensures that these projects are subject to rigorous oversight, addressing concerns related to environmental protection, safety, and the sustainable management of marine resources.

Facilitating Offshore Wind Development

One of the most significant implications of Bill C-49 is the facilitation of offshore wind development in the jointly managed offshore areas of Newfoundland & Labrador and Nova Scotia. The amendments introduced by the bill set the stage for the issuance of permits, licences, and authorizations required for these projects to move forward. Nova Scotia has announced its intention to launch a call for bids for up to 5 gigawatts of offshore wind capacity in 2025. With the regulatory framework soon in place, the province can confidently pursue its ambitious renewable energy goals, attracting investment and driving economic growth in the region.

The passing of Bill C-49 aligns with the federal government's commitment to advancing renewable energy sources and reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the energy sector. By enabling offshore renewable energy development, this legislation supports the energy expansion to include a clean energy economy in Atlantic Canada. Offshore wind energy, with its incredible potential and scalability, represents an important component of this expansion. By harnessing the region's abundant offshore wind resources, Atlantic Canada can diversify its energy mix, reduce its reliance on carbon-based fuels, and contribute to Canada's efforts to mitigate the impacts of climate change.

Regulatory Clarity and Input from Indigenous and Stakeholder Engagement

One of the key benefits of Bill C-49 is the introduction of a clear regulatory framework for offshore renewable energy projects. The legislation addresses issues such as land tenure, marine boundaries, and provincial benefits in federal offshore areas. This regulatory clarity is essential for attracting investment and strengthening confidence in the offshore renewable energy industry. Investors and developers will be able to proceed with greater certainty, knowing that their projects will operate within a well-defined legal and regulatory environment.

Throughout the legislative process, the government engaged with Indigenous communities, fisheries groups, and other stakeholders in Atlantic Canada to gather input and address concerns related to offshore renewable energy development. This approach recognizes the importance of considering diverse perspectives and ensuring that the development of offshore wind projects is conducted in a responsible and sustainable manner, respecting the rights and interests of all stakeholders.

A Promising Future for Offshore Wind and Next Steps

The road ahead will undoubtedly present challenges, but with a robust regulatory framework in place, Atlantic Canada is better-positioned to navigate these challenges and emerge as a leader in the offshore wind industry. The development of these projects will not only support the renewables sector but also drive economic growth, create jobs, and promote innovation in the region.

As Atlantic Canada begins this new energy chapter, the passing of Bill C-49 represents a significant milestone. By unlocking the potential for offshore wind and other renewable energy projects, this legislation prepares the way for a future where the region can harness its abundant natural resources while contributing to a cleaner, more sustainable energy landscape.

The Bill is not without its critics. Potential negative impacts of the legislation on investment certainty and economic development have recently been voiced in parliamentary debate, urging for a reconsideration of the bill's passage. Concerns have been presented about flaws and constitutional issues drawing attention to the precedent set by the striking down of significant portions of a similar bill, C-69. There are arguments that Bill C-49's similarity to the unconstitutional aspects of C-69 raises concerns about its constitutionality and emphasize a need for a different approach that prioritizes clarity, compliance with constitutional principles, and fostering a favorable environment for investment in the energy sector. 

So, what's next? Passage in the House of Commons is an important step but it’s not law yet! Once passed, a Canadian bill must be approved by the Senate, both chambers must agree on the final version, and then it receives Royal Assent from the Governor General to become law.

For more of my posts on Nova Scotia's offshore wind, see here, here, here, here, and here. ∎

I realize that it's becoming cliché to complain about social media these days, but it really is getting dark out there. Every platform I dip my toes into has the same polemic BS now. Is there nothing else to discuss? It's quite amazing to me that no matter what social media platform you're on, there are really only two dominant topics of conversation today, all with armies of rage-merchants trying to sway your opinion. These spaces, originally designed to connect us with a diverse array of ideas and experiences, have instead funneled our attention into a limited and divisive scope of conversation. 

And it raises questions about the authenticity of our online interactions and the true nature of the internet we engage with daily. The Dead Internet Theory might not be correct, but it sure feels real. So does Cory Doctorow's platform decay concept of enshittification. Much of the interface we have with the web in 2024 is now fake - manufactured content to get your clicks, payments, and rage. The same threads, the same pics, and the same replies reposted over and over by bots and partisan instigators, all with made-up avis and bios. The gradual degradation of online platforms resonates with many users who have witnessed the decline of these once-promising digital spaces. 

We need to get back to the basics like free thought and free exchange of ideas. I wrote about this last November, and nothing has really improved. The online experience continues to be stained by increasing onslaughts of ads, constant scams, overzealous fan communities, political flame throwers, opaque algorithms, subscription paywalls, and invasive tracking mechanisms. And the polarization and toxicity on these platforms have really impacted the way we humans interface with each other - and it's not good. I know it's wreaked havoc with my own thinking and reasoning.

I've all but abandoned facebook. I still have the account but only check in once in a while to ensure it hasn't been taken over. X continues its death spiral and is ridiculously right-wing now, full of toxic division and outright lies. It's getting much harder to stay active there. Reading the "For You" timeline has me feeling like I'm being radicalized. What did Nietzsche say?

"And if you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss also gazes into you."

Essentially, it's a warning that the toxicity you observe will ultimately also poison you. We choose our social environments and those environments also shape us. How we treat others changes how they interact with us.

I checked out Bluesky last year, but that seems too far left for me. Many of the folks I had muted on X went there and it's the same old thing. But I'm giving it another try lately. I'm also trying out CounterSocial which seems to be quiet with a timeline and appearance like early twitter, and better politically balanced overall so far. We'll see.

In the end, it's important for everyone to remember that life's authenticity and richness extend far beyond the confines of social media - the digital realm offers only a limited, highly curated glimpse of our complex reality, no matter what platform we use. ∎

"The Mi’kmaq have lived on, and been stewards of, the lands of Mi’kma’ki since time immemorial.  

These lands and its resources are an intrinsic part of our culture, well-being and world view" 

~Chief Sidney Peters, Assembly of Nova Scotia Mi’kmaw Chiefs

~~~~~~~~~~

Atlantic Canada's offshore wind potential has gathered significant attention in recent years with its world-class wind speeds positioning the region as a prime location for renewable energy development. As provinces like Nova Scotia announce ambitious plans to offer leases for offshore wind development, the importance of involving Indigenous communities in this developing industry cannot be overstated. This post examines the current state of Indigenous participation in offshore wind development in Atlantic Canada, highlighting the challenges, opportunities, and the critical need for a collaborative approach.

The involvement of Indigenous communities in renewable energy projects across Canada has been steadily increasing, reflecting a growing interest in sustainable economic development, self-determination, and climate change adaptation. As of 2021, there were 197 renewable energy projects associated with Indigenous communities in Canada. However, it's worth noting that very few of these projects were controlled by Indigenous communities themselves, underscoring the need for greater Indigenous ownership and control in the renewable energy sector.

The participation of Indigenous peoples in offshore wind development is important for several reasons. Firstly, as a matter of respecting the Aboriginal and treaty rights related to fishing and marine resources that Indigenous communities hold. These rights, which have been affirmed by Canadian courts, need to be carefully considered in any offshore development plans. Secondly, Indigenous communities possess valuable traditional ecological knowledge that can inform sustainable development practices and environmental stewardship. This knowledge, accumulated over millennia of living and working with the land and sea, can provide invaluable insights into local ecosystems and help mitigate potential environmental impacts.

Offshore wind development presents significant economic opportunities for Indigenous communities. The installation and operation of offshore wind facilities could bring substantial direct economic benefits, with up to 30,000 jobs required during the multi-year installation of a 15-gigawatt facility. Ensuring that Indigenous communities have access to these opportunities, as well as their participation in the supply chain and related industries, is critical for equitable development.

Several initiatives are already underway to advance Indigenous participation in Atlantic Canada's offshore wind development. Some wind projects in Nova Scotia, for instance, are being built in partnership with Indigenous groups like the Sipekne'katik First Nation. Both federal and provincial governments have emphasized the importance of collaborating with Indigenous communities and integrating Indigenous perspectives in offshore renewable energy development. The Nova Scotia government's Offshore Wind Roadmap includes a module that will reflect input from the Mi'kmaq and other Indigenous peoples.

Some projects are incorporating the concept of "two-eyed seeing," which involves implementing Western science and technology alongside Indigenous knowledge and perspectives. This approach recognizes the value of both knowledge systems and seeks to create a more holistic and sustainable approach to development. Additionally, programs like the 20/20 Catalysts Program are supporting Indigenous communities in developing knowledge and skills for community-based renewable energy projects.

Despite these positive developments, several challenges remain. Ensuring free, prior, and informed consent from Indigenous communities for offshore wind projects is important and can be complex, particularly given the offshore nature of these developments. Many Indigenous communities lack official titles to their traditional territories, which can complicate project development and benefit-sharing arrangements. There are also concerns about potential impacts on marine ecosystems and traditional fishing practices that need to be carefully addressed. Indigenous communities may require additional resources and support to fully participate in and benefit from offshore wind development. This includes not only financial resources but also capacity building in areas such as project management, renewable energy technology, and environmental assessment.

To ensure a just and inclusive development of offshore wind in Atlantic Canada, several key actions are necessary:

• Implement robust consultation processes that go beyond mere information sharing to actively involve Indigenous communities in decision-making.

• Invest in programs that build Indigenous capacity in renewable energy development, project management, and related fields.

• Develop partnership models that ensure Indigenous communities have significant ownership stakes and decision-making power in offshore wind projects.

• Implement policies that prioritize Indigenous participation and benefit-sharing in offshore wind development.

• Integrate Indigenous traditional knowledge into environmental assessment and monitoring processes.

• Create pathways for Indigenous businesses to participate in the offshore wind supply chain and related industries.

The development of offshore wind in Atlantic Canada offers a unique opportunity to advance both clean energy goals and Indigenous reconciliation. By prioritizing meaningful Indigenous participation, respecting traditional rights and knowledge, and developing equitable partnerships, the region can create a model for sustainable and just energy development. As the industry progresses, continued dialogue, collaboration, and adaptive management will be essential to ensure that offshore wind development aligns with Indigenous values and aspirations while contributing to a sustainable energy future for all. Their involvement is not just a matter of consultation, but of true partnership and shared decision-making.

For more of my posts on Nova Scotia's offshore wind, see here, here, here, here, and here. ∎

"It is not impermanence that makes us suffer. 

What makes us suffer is wanting things to be permanent when they are not” 

~Thich Nhat Hanh

Whew. It’s been a hard few years, huh? In the turbulence of recent years, I've found myself exploring the concept of impermanence. Life has thrown its fair share of challenges my way recently — had cancer, endured a global pandemic, lost loved ones, changed careers a couple of times, watched relationships fade, and just observed a general decline overall in quality of experiences as I get older. It seems that for many of us, life is becoming increasingly difficult. Most things in life are not permanent. Like the seasons, everything comes and goes. But usually, when things change, we try to resist and hold on to the past.

Impermanence, the idea that everything is in a constant state of change, is a truth recognized by many philosophical traditions. In Buddhism, it's called anicca, highlighting the fleeting nature of all things. Stoicism, an ancient Greek philosophy, also acknowledges life's impermanence, encouraging us to accept change as a means to find inner peace. One of the more relatable ideas I've encountered is the allegory of stepping into a river. Heraclitus famously said, 

"No man ever steps in the same river twice, 

for it's not the same river and he's not the same man"

This metaphor beautifully captures the essence of impermanence. Just as the river's waters are always flowing and changing, so too are the circumstances of our lives. We often don’t choose the change or chaos thrown at us, but we do choose how to respond. This allegory has helped me deal with life's flux rather than resist it. It doesn’t always work, but it’s a tool in the drawer for me to bring out whenever I need it.

Losing loved ones has been one of the most challenging experiences of my life. Yet, understanding impermanence has helped me cope. It reminds me that grief is a natural process and that healing takes time. Recognizing that everything, including my emotions, is temporary allows me to feel my grief without being overwhelmed by it. This perspective challenges me to cherish the moments I had with those I've lost and find happiness in the memories we shared. Life's unpredictability often brings upset—unexpected events, financial instability, or changing relationships. 

Changing careers was a daunting experience, especially in today's volatile market. However, embracing impermanence helped me approach this challenge with flexibility and openness to new possibilities. By viewing career changes as opportunities for personal and professional development, I've been able to navigate these transitions with a sense of purpose and confidence. This approach encourages continuous learning and adaptability, essential skills in our rapidly evolving world. Relationships are dynamic and subject to change, whether through growth, conflict, or separation. Understanding impermanence has enhanced my relationships by fostering gratitude for the present moment and reducing attachment to specific outcomes. By accepting that people and circumstances evolve, I've been able to cultivate deeper connections based on mutual respect and understanding, rather than clinging to a fixed idea of how things should be. This lesson has been hard. I like clinging to things.

By understanding impermanence, I try to reduce the emotional impact that comes with these uncertainties. I focus on what I can control, my thoughts, emotions, and actions, while letting go of what I cannot. This mindset has helped build resilience in me, allowing me to adapt to change and find growth opportunities even in difficult circumstances. I still have a long way to go to find peace through change. 

I am inherently resistant to change so none of life's lessons and philosophies come easy for me to tackle the problem. It takes a lot of work and repetition. By sticking with it, this awareness does allow me to experience the present and respond to changes with better clarity. Cultivating gratitude for the present and accepting impermanence as a natural part of life has enhanced my overall well-being. The allegory of the river serves as a powerful reminder that, while I cannot control the flow of life, I can choose how I respond to it, finding wisdom and virtue in the process. ∎

Atlantic Canada is poised to become a significant player in the renewable energy sector, particularly in the wind energy industry. The region's abundant wind resources and strategic proximity to New England's developing offshore wind projects position it favorably for growth. However, both the offshore and onshore wind supply chains face distinct challenges and opportunities that need to be addressed to realize this potential.

Offshore Wind Sector

Potential and Resources

The offshore wind sector in Atlantic Canada is still in its early stages, with no turbines currently operating or under construction. Despite this, the region's offshore wind speeds are among the best in the world, comparable to those of the North Sea. This makes the region an attractive location for future offshore wind projects.

Challenges and Limitations

The development of offshore wind faces several hurdles, including environmental considerations, existing uses of offshore areas, limited manufacturing capacity for turbine subcomponents, and a lack of specialized vessels and equipment. High upfront capital costs and regulatory and permitting delays further complicate the landscape.

Regulatory Framework

Nova Scotia, for instance, has set ambitious targets to licence five gigawatts of offshore generation capacity by 2030. The introduction of Bill C-49 aims to streamline the regulatory regime, facilitating the development of offshore wind projects by allowing joint federal-provincial oversight. This legislative effort is important for creating a predictable regulatory environment that can attract investment and ensure timely project approvals. However, successful implementation will require careful coordination between federal and provincial authorities to streamline processes and reduce regulatory overlap.

Onshore Wind Sector

Established Supply Chain

The onshore wind sector in Atlantic Canada is more established, benefiting from years of development to serve markets in Ontario, Quebec, and the U.S. The supply chain for onshore wind is relatively robust, with existing equipment and service suppliers. However, most major components for onshore wind farms, such as turbines, blades, and towers, are still imported from other countries. 

Local spending during the construction of onshore wind farms is primarily focused on site preparation, assembly, electrical infrastructure, and various services like heavy equipment operation and construction labor.

Supply Chain Challenges

Manufacturing and Equipment Gaps

One of the key challenges for both onshore and offshore wind sectors is the limited existing supply chain and manufacturing capacity in Atlantic Canada. The region has limited capacity to manufacture turbine subcomponents and other major components needed for wind farms. Additionally, there is a lack of purpose-built vessels for offshore wind farm construction and maintenance, and a limited supply of specialized equipment like high voltage subsea transmission cables, with most manufacturing located in Europe. Addressing these gaps is critical for developing a robust local supply chain.

Investment and Capital Costs

The high upfront capital costs and need for investment present another significant challenge. Developing wind energy projects and integrating them into the North American grid will require significant amounts of capital investment. Attracting sufficient investment from global sources is challenging given the many competing opportunities worldwide for wind energy development. Innovative financing mechanisms and strategies will be needed to attract the necessary investment to the region.

Workforce Development

Education and Training Programs

The shortage of skilled labor is another pressing issue facing the wind energy sector. To address this challenge, Atlantic Canada has implemented specialized education and training programs, such as the Wind Turbine Technician programs at Holland College and the College of the North Atlantic, as well as renewables-specific training at Nova Scotia Community College. These initiatives, along with research opportunities provided by the Wind Energy Institute of Canada (WEICan), are important steps in developing a skilled workforce capable of supporting both onshore and offshore wind projects.

Outreach and Partnerships

Engaging with local communities, particularly Indigenous groups, ensures their perspectives are incorporated into project planning. By integrating these initiatives into the wind energy sector's growth strategy, Atlantic Canada can address the skilled labor shortage while creating a more innovative and equitable industry, promoting sustainable economic growth and social progress in the region.

Addressing Skilled Labor Shortages and Promoting Inclusivity in the Supply Chain

Developing opportunities for inclusivity in the wind supply chain is important. This can be achieved through targeted outreach programs to underrepresented communities, partnerships with organizations promoting STEM education for marginalized groups, and the implementation of mentorship programs. Additionally, developing supply chain diversity by prioritizing partnerships with women-owned, minority-owned, and Indigenous-owned businesses can create a more inclusive ecosystem. 

Supporting and promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion in the wind energy sector requires a multi-faceted approach, including implementing inclusive recruitment practices, developing a workplace culture that values diversity, providing cultural competency training, and establishing employee resource groups.

Stakeholder Engagement

Indigenous Communities

Stakeholder engagement and collaboration are essential for the successful development of the wind energy sector in Atlantic Canada. The involvement of Indigenous communities, industry, suppliers, governments, and other stakeholders is critical for developing a comprehensive and actionable strategy. Engaging with Indigenous communities will provide essential insights into traditional knowledge, environmental stewardship, and community needs.

Fishing Industry Concerns

Additionally, addressing concerns from the fishing industry about the potential impact of offshore wind development on employment, fish populations, and overall economic and environmental impacts is vital.

Key Organizations and Collaborations

Regional and National Support

Key organizations in Atlantic Canada’s renewable energy ecosystem play critical roles in supporting innovation, attracting investment, and promoting collaboration within the sector. These include regional Indigenous governance and organizations, the Atlantica Centre for Energy, Canada's Ocean Supercluster, the Canadian Renewable Energy Association (CanREA), the Centre for Ocean Ventures and Entrepreneurship (COVE), fishing associations, Invest Nova Scotia, Net Zero Atlantic, the Ocean Startup Challenge, the Ocean Technology Council of Nova Scotia (OCTNS), the Strait of Canso Offshore Wind Task Force, Sustainable Ocean Applied Research (SOAR), universities and colleges, and utilities. These organizations play critical roles in supporting innovation, attracting investment, and fostering collaboration within the sector.

Atlantic Canada has the potential to become a leader in sustainable energy production through the development of both offshore and onshore wind energy. The region's abundant wind resources, combined with effective stakeholder engagement and strategic development of the supply chain, can position Atlantic Canada as a significant player in the renewable energy sector. The potential benefits are significant, including job creation, economic growth, and a substantial contribution to Canada's clean energy transition and climate change mitigation efforts.

For more of my posts on Nova Scotia's offshore wind, see here, here, here, and here. ∎

Atlantic Canada has excellent conditions for offshore wind – shallow water close to land and strong sustained winds. The region also has existing infrastructure, a strong industrial base, skilled workforce with transferable skills (offshore experience from oil & gas industry), and suitable deep-water ports serving as supply and service hubs with export opportunities to the US markets.

Currently, there are no offshore wind projects underway in Atlantic Canada. Although developers such as Nova East and Simply Blue have expressed interest in pursuing specific offshore wind projects in the area, the current absence of a relevant regulatory framework in Atlantic Canada has paused authorizations for offshore renewable projects.

Regulatory Framework

Nova Scotia’s offshore energy sector has historically been regulated by the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board (CNSOPB) which was established in the late 1980s to manage offshore petroleum activities. This framework encompasses safety standards, environmental assessments, and permitting processes. However, both the federal and provincial governments now recognize the need for an updated regulatory regime tailored to specifically include offshore wind energy and ensure a streamlined and efficient permitting process for timely project approvals. Adapting and expanding this regulatory regime to accommodate offshore wind energy is currently in progress.

Provincial Waters

Offshore areas in Atlantic Canada are currently managed jointly by both the federal and provincial governments, with the specific nearshore maritime zones falling under provincial jurisdiction. While efforts are underway to update the Nova Scotia and Newfoundland Offshore Accord Acts to include marine renewables like offshore wind in the jointly managed regions, Nova Scotia’s provincial Marine Renewable-energy Act provides a regulatory framework for projects within provincial waters.

Marine Renewable-energy Act

• Introduced in 2015 and took effect in January 2018.

• Regulates offshore wind development within provincial waters (up to 3 nautical miles).

• Only directly pertains to Nova Scotia.

The implementation and key provisions of the Act established the first comprehensive regulatory framework for marine renewable energy projects in Canada. This Act fills a regulatory gap within the provincial jurisdiction, complementing federal efforts like Bill C-49, which target offshore renewable energy projects beyond provincial boundaries.

It opens new opportunities for developers by allowing diverse technologies to harness tidal, wave, and wind energy encouraging innovative marine renewable energy projects beyond previous models like Fundy Ocean Research Center for Energy (FORCE) or Community Feed-in Tariff (COMFIT).

• FORCE stands for Fundy Ocean Research Center for Energy, which is a research facility located in the Bay of Fundy, Nova Scotia, Canada. It serves as a testing ground for various technologies related to tidal energy generation.

• COMFIT stands for Community Feed-in Tariff, a program in Nova Scotia designed to promote community participation in renewable energy projects.

The Act designates two “marine renewable energy priority areas” (currently located in the Bay of Fundy and Cape Breton’s Bras d’Or Lakes). Marine renewable energy projects are only undertaken in the priority areas under a permit or licence issued by the Minister of Energy. It designates smaller marine renewable-electricity areas (MREAs) specifically for in-stream tidal projects within the larger Bay of Fundy area. It also sets up new licencing and permitting regimes for the construction, installation, and operation of generators and related equipment, streamlining the process through proactive applications with specific criteria and timelines. Proponents must have a licence or permit issued under the Act to construct, install or operate a generator, or a cable or any other equipment or structure used or intended to be used with a generator, within a Priority Area.

This legislation introduces constraints such as limiting the commercial sale of electricity for onshore use primarily to in-stream tidal energy generation and pricing uncertainties for grid-connected projects. It mandates compliance with environmental and Aboriginal engagement requirements while setting limits on demonstration permits' capacity. The Act outlines essential project planning details, including application requirements, environmental monitoring, engagement obligations, intergovernmental consultation processes, and permit terms, alongside providing flexibility and guidance to accommodate the early stage of the marine renewable energy industry.

Nova Scotia recently announced a pause (Nov 2023) in the plan to advance offshore wind projects within provincial waters - emphasizing the importance of creating a robust regulatory framework for jointly managed offshore areas before investigating waters solely under provincial control. This decision was made to address concerns raised by regional fisheries organizations. Lobbying by these groups highlights the importance of considering the potential impact of wind farms on historic fishing grounds, which are already crowded and under strain due to various factors. Site selection for early projects will need to prioritize factors such as infrastructure, environmental considerations, and collaboration with Indigenous communities and the fishing industry. 

The recently issued Nova Scotia Offshore Wind Roadmap (Module One) anticipates that the Act will transition its role once Bill C-49 comes into full effect, focusing on provincial nearshore areas while federal regulations handle projects in jointly managed offshore waters. Even after this transition, the Act could still influence how nearshore wind projects are managed and approved in Nova Scotia.

Provincial Environmental Assessment

Projects exceeding a production rating of 2 MW must undergo site-specific Environmental Assessments following the guidelines of the Nova Scotia Environment Act and Environmental Assessment Regulations.

There are two types of EAs under the provincial system:

• Class 1 projects are generally smaller in size and may or may not have notable environmental effects or raise significant public concerns. As a result, a public evaluation of the initial submission or registration by the proponent is mandatory, with the Minister determining if a more thorough review or public hearing is necessary.

• Class 2 projects are typically larger in scope and are recognized for their potential to cause substantial environmental impacts and public apprehension. They require an environmental assessment report and a formal public review process that may involve hearings.

Jointly Managed Waters

The shared jurisdiction encompasses waters extending from shorelines outside bays within Canada's exclusive economic zone, extending 200 nautical miles—an expanse that requires careful planning and consideration. With its experience in offshore petroleum regulation, the CNSOPB is now undergoing a transformation to become the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Energy Regulator (CNSOER), reflecting a broader mandate to regulate offshore renewable energy projects, particularly offshore wind. This expansion is aimed at ensuring a smooth transition to the regulation of offshore wind activities, with a strong emphasis on safety and environmental protection.

Bill C-49

The Federal Government recently introduced Bill C-49 during the summer of 2023, aimed at instituting a contemporary regulatory framework for offshore wind projects. The bill will expand the existing regulatory mechanisms of the CNSOPB & CNLOPB established under the Nova Scotia and Newfoundland Offshore Accord Acts by leveraging the foundational petroleum regulatory regimes of both provinces.

This bill seeks to modernize the regulation of offshore energy resources by establishing a unified federal-provincial regulatory framework, introducing new environmental safeguards, and promoting sustainable development. It expands enforcement tools for safety and environmental protection, clarifies jurisdictional rules, and sets standards for Marine Protected Areas within offshore areas governed by the regulations. Bill C-49 also seeks to improve alignment with the Impact Assessment Act, establish new authorities to support Canada's marine conservation targets, and streamline applications for seabed rights approvals.

Offshore Accord Acts

Both the federal and provincial governments are introducing legislative changes to accommodate the regulatory adjustments necessary for offshore wind development. This legislative overhaul aligns with broader initiatives such as Nova Scotia's Climate Change Action Plan and Renewable Electricity Plan, which demonstrate the province's commitment to transitioning to renewable energy sources.

The Government of Canada has introduced amendments aimed at instituting a collaborative management framework with the provinces of Newfoundland and Labrador and Nova Scotia concerning offshore renewable energy. These amendments, set forth in the Canada–Newfoundland and Labrador Atlantic Accord Implementation Act and Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Resources Accord Implementation Act (referred to as the Accord Acts), will broaden the responsibilities of the two offshore petroleum boards to encompass the oversight of offshore renewable energy activities, particularly offshore wind projects.

Offshore Wind Roadmaps

In 2022, Nova Scotia announced its target to allocate leases for 5 GW of offshore wind energy by 2030, signifying a substantial commitment to renewable energy development. The first Call for Bids is planned for 2025. To progress towards this goal, the province developed the Offshore Wind Roadmap, made up of three modules. This roadmap outlines the province’s vision for offshore wind and provides a regulatory path for project developers.

• Module 1 – (released May 2023) outlines the legislative and regulatory requirements for offshore wind projects.

• Module 2 – (expected mid-2024) will outline supply chain, infrastructure, and clean growth opportunities for offshore wind and provide more information on the development of a clear regulatory regime for the jointly managed waters.

• Module 3 – (expected in Fall 2024) will incorporate input from Indigenous peoples, industry, academia, and community stakeholders. It will also incorporate feedback from the federal-provincial regional assessment of offshore wind development started in March 2023 with ongoing engagement beyond the module's release.

The first module signaled the province’s intent to pursue early wind development in nearshore areas under its jurisdiction, with seabed rights issuance slated to begin in 2024 (currently on pause due to concerns from stakeholders). Module 1 also highlighted Nova Scotia's commitment to align provincial legislative amendments with federal amendments introduced through Bill C-49. These amendments are necessary to modernize the mandate of the CNSOPB and establish a regulatory framework for offshore wind development in joint federal-provincial managed areas.

Regional Assessments

The regulatory process for offshore wind development involves streamlining procedures for bidding and licence approval to speed up project development while maintaining rigorous reviews. Currently there are two comprehensive Regional Assessments underway; one each for Nova Scotia and Newfoundland & Labrador to evaluate the potential environmental, social, and economic impacts of offshore wind projects.

These Regional Assessments play an important role in the developing regulatory framework by providing comprehensive data and analysis to inform regulatory decisions. They will help regulators understand the potential benefits and risks associated with offshore wind development and ensure that proposed projects comply with existing regulations and environmental standards. Additionally, the assessments will facilitate stakeholder engagement and public consultation, allowing for input from various interested parties in the decision-making process.

Project Specific Environmental Assessments

As part of the current petroleum focused system of CNSOPB Activity Authorizations, developers seeking to operate in the Canada-Nova Scotia offshore region are mandated to undertake a project-specific Environmental Assessment as part of their application process for conducting offshore operations. It is expected that this approach will continue once the framework includes renewable energy. Approval of the content within the project specific assessment is a prerequisite before any offshore activities can begin. The project-specific Environmental Assessment is an extension of the data gathered during the Regional Assessment and aids in forecasting the potential effects of a proposed operation on the marine environment within a designated offshore area. The necessity for project-specific Environmental Assessments and/or Impact Assessments is contingent upon the nature of the operation, with both the Board and/or the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (IAAC) stipulating these requirements.

Depending on the nature of the activity, a project-specific environmental assessment may be conducted through the Board, or IAAC may lead an impact assessment to support the Board’s evaluation of an application under the Accord Acts. The duration of an environmental assessment or impact assessment process can vary from approximately six months to three years, based on legislative requirements for the specific activity proposed. This process must be finalized before approval can be granted for an authorization for offshore activities.

Before proposing an activity, operators are required to prepare and gather documentation related to the project, along with undergoing the environmental assessment process. Additionally, operators must apply for an operating licence and renew it upon expiry; licences cannot be transferred between companies.

When operators are ready to submit documents for activity authorization, a coordinator is assigned to facilitate the review conducted by the Board. Upon completion of document reviews and granting of authorization, the Board’s focus shifts to Monitoring and Compliance. This phase ensures that activities adhere to all regulatory requirements and commitments outlined in the application.

Supporting Role - US Offshore Wind

Along with the region’s own sector growth, the strategic location of Atlantic Canada to New England's developing offshore wind projects holds broad industry promise for both countries. As the US accelerates its adoption of offshore wind energy, the Jones Act, a US federal statute that mandates the use of US-built and operated vessels for domestic maritime commerce, presents a challenge for their industry's growth. This is where Atlantic Canada's well-established maritime ability and supply chain efficiencies come into play.

Nova Scotia’s heritage and industry experience position the province as a natural partner for the US offshore wind sector. With shared waters, Nova Scotia serves as a hub for supplying the necessary components and services, helping both economies while adhering to the Jones Act regulations. The Port of Halifax is serving as a waypoint in the logistics & supply chain to service the developing wind projects off the US east coast. This collaboration highlights the potential for trans-border cooperation and shows how historical ties and regional strengths can fuel the renewable energy transition in a sustainable and mutually beneficial manner.

Additionally, there is the development of a New England – Maritimes Offshore Energy Corridor (NEMOEC).  This transmission corridor aims to connect wind turbines off the coast of Nova Scotia and in the Gulf of Maine to power grids in Nova Scotia and New England. This project is a planned 2 GW high voltage direct current (HVDC) subsea transmission corridor. The NEMOEC project is expected to bring significant benefits, including unlocking access to renewable energy sources, reducing reliance on natural gas, improving grid reliability, minimizing impacts on local fisheries, and providing opportunities for wind developers to sell their product where it can generate the highest revenue.

Despite the current absence of a comprehensive regulatory framework, initiatives such as Nova Scotia's Marine Renewable-energy Act and the Federal Government's Bill C-49 reflect proactive steps toward facilitating offshore wind projects. Collaborative efforts between federal and provincial governments, alongside regional assessments and strategic partnerships with UK, Europe, and the United States, demonstrate a commitment to responsible and efficient renewable energy development. Prioritizing environmental sustainability and inclusive decision-making processes will be key as Atlantic Canada navigates the complexities of offshore wind development. By leveraging our regional strengths and marine innovation, Nova Scotia can position itself as a leader in offshore wind, contributing to global efforts in combating climate change.

For more of my posts on Nova Scotia's offshore wind, see here, here, and here. ∎

The energy landscape in Atlantic Canada is undergoing a transformative shift, fueled by the promise of renewable energy such as wind and green hydrogen (produced via electrolysis powered by wind energy). Green hydrogen offers promise for a sustainable future, yet harnessing its potential requires a balanced approach that recognizes both the exciting possibilities and the challenges we must address.

Wind-Powered Potential

Green hydrogen is produced via water electrolysis (separation of water into hydrogen and oxygen) using renewable electricity, providing a cleaner alternative to grey hydrogen sourced from carbon based fuels. Atlantic Canada, with its abundant onshore and offshore wind resources, emerges as a potential frontrunner in green hydrogen production. Nova Scotia's Green Hydrogen Action Plan outlines a comprehensive strategy, emphasizing geographical advantages for export to Europe and focusing on critical areas like workforce training, community engagement, and regulatory support. The province recently approved green hydrogen projects (and the storable derivative - green ammonia) with commercial operation anticipated by 2028. 

Developing Projects

Nova Scotia's ambitious ventures include two large-scale projects that leverage the abundant renewable resources of onshore and offshore wind. Major projects like EverWind Fuels' Point Tupper facility (anticipated launch in 2025) and Bear Head Energy's venture (targeting 2028 operation) mark significant milestones, promising economic contributions and large-scale production. Similarly, Newfoundland and Labrador boasts initiatives like World Energy's green hydrogen/ammonia production facility, aiming to be Canada's first commercial venture, with aspirations to establish Atlantic Canada as a key green hydrogen hub for Europe. Notably, the province aims to collaborate with the Port of Rotterdam, positioning itself as a vital green hydrogen hub for northwestern Europe. These initiatives demonstrate the region's commitment to sustainable energy production (S&P Global). 

Economic and Social Impacts

The economic and social implications of green hydrogen are evident. It attracts investment, stimulates economic growth, aligns with Canada's net-zero 2050 goal, and positions Atlantic Canada as a leader in green energy (Atlantic Hydrogen Alliance). But responsible development is essential. In the exploration of green hydrogen's potential in Atlantic Canada, there is a lot of hype and uncertainty, especially surrounding the local and international demand for eco-friendly green hydrogen. 

While there is a great deal of regional optimism today, challenges require careful consideration. The evolving hydrogen market, production costs, and technological bottlenecks in transportation require strategic solutions. Environmental concerns like ecosystem impacts, noise pollution, and the possibility of hydrogen leaks contributing to greenhouse gas emissions necessitate responsible mitigation strategies (EDF). The industry requires careful consideration amid global energy transformations and climate change goals. Logistical hurdles, transportation bottlenecks, and regulatory complexities pose obstacles. Delays in market readiness and project timelines also amplify the need for strategic planning and collaborative problem-solving.

Charting a Sustainable Path

Addressing and mitigating these challenges will need a multi-pronged approach. Streamlining regulations, investing in innovative technologies, and fostering international collaborations are important strategies for steering green hydrogen projects toward sustainable success in Atlantic Canada. Responsible development requires transparent stakeholder engagement, addressing social concerns like potential job displacement and ensuring fair distribution of benefits within communities (IREA). Understanding potential risks and implementing a collaborative stakeholder-driven approach is essential to mitigate these risks and secure the industry's long-term success. 

Beyond economic benefits, the establishment of green hydrogen projects may lead to a sustainable and innovative energy sector in Atlantic Canada and position the region as a leader in the production and export of green hydrogen. This transition has broad implications for the communities in Atlantic Canada. Capitalizing on the region's access to abundant renewable energy resources and relatively low population, it fuels a greener energy future. The potential social impacts of green hydrogen projects in Atlantic Canada are significant. The development of a green hydrogen industry not only stimulates economic growth but also attracts investment to the region. Additionally, this transition to green hydrogen is a step towards the decarbonization of the economy acting as a catalyst in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and aligning with global efforts to combat climate change. 

With strategic planning, responsible development, and collaborative efforts, Atlantic Canada has the potential to harness the power of green hydrogen for a sustainable, carbon-neutral future. Acknowledging the challenges and remaining cautious of potential downsides is important to ensure this path leads to a responsible future for Atlantic Canada and our greater economic market. ∎

The government of Nova Scotia recently announced a pause in its plan to fast-track offshore wind projects within waters under the provincial jurisdiction. The decision emphasized the importance of creating a robust regulatory framework for jointly managed offshore areas before investigating waters solely under provincial control. The shared jurisdiction encompasses waters extending from shorelines outside bays within Canada's exclusive economic zone, extending 200 nautical miles—an expanse that requires careful planning and consideration.

Collaborative Development for Offshore Wind Farms

Although it seems like a setback, it's a decision made to address concerns raised by regional fisheries organizations. Lobbying by these groups highlight the importance of considering the potential impact of wind farms on historic fishing grounds, which are already crowded and under strain due to various factors. Fishing is a historical and deeply ingrained industry here in Nova Scotia with many pressures and challenges. Fishers are rightfully seeking more research and expressing concern about economic losses associated with the development of offshore wind.

The government plans to be offering licences for 5 GW of offshore wind energy by 2030, with the first call for bids scheduled for 2025. While there are currently no offshore wind projects under development, the government's decision to release the first module of the Offshore Wind Roadmap is proactive. This roadmap outlines Nova Scotia's vision for offshore wind and provides a regulatory path for businesses interested in investing in these projects. The second module of the roadmap, slated for release in the spring, will shed further light on the development of a clear regulatory regime for jointly managed waters. It is expected to focus on supply chain, infrastructure and clean growth opportunities. The third module (expected fall 2024) will focus on input from stakeholders, including Mi’kmaq communities, fisheries, and academia. It will also incorporate feedback from the federal-provincial regional assessment of offshore wind development initiated in March 2023 with ongoing engagement beyond the module's release.

This approach ensures that all interested parties, including fisheries groups, have a say in shaping the future of offshore wind development in Nova Scotia. The Province is recognizing the economic importance of the fishing industry and seems committed to addressing concerns related to potential economic losses associated with offshore wind development. 

Successful Coexistence and Industry Considerations

The fishing industry is concerned about offshore wind's potential impact on jobs, fish populations, fishing operations, and overall economic and environmental impacts. There's concern that coastal wind turbine construction could jeopardize livelihoods and fish populations, prompting a call for more research into these effects. Additionally, concerns include disruptions requiring compensation and the need for alternative employment for fishers. Despite these concerns, it's important to note that offshore wind already coexists successfully with maritime and fishing industries, with close collaboration throughout development, construction, and operation. 

The coexistence of offshore wind and commercial fishing has been successfully demonstrated in various projects worldwide and Nova Scotia can draw upon these successes to design projects to account for common industry considerations. This includes collaboration throughout project development, allowing commercial fishing within wind farm boundaries, and coordinating turbine spacing and layouts in consultation with stakeholders and relevant authorities.

As we Nova Scotians wait for the outcome of ongoing consultations and the subsequent development of a regulatory framework, there is an opportunity for constructive dialogue. Although a disappointing pause, the government's responsiveness to feedback and commitment to a sustainable and inclusive energy future bode well for the province's long-term wind energy development.

For more of my thoughts on Nova Scotia's offshore wind, see here, and here. ∎

"The disease might hide the person underneath, but there's still a person in there who desperately needs your love and attention." 

~Jamie Calandriello

~~~~~~~~~~

I would make the trip down to see her every few weeks. She would usually be working in the kitchen just inside the door, dressed smartly as always, hair freshly done, happy to see me but soon to be darting off to some local function. My Mom was a key member of the community and always in demand. Active in her church, the choir, local committees - always buzzing around, even into her early 80s. Smart. Sharp. Active. Caring. Respected.

Mom had been living alone since my brothers and I moved away from home to attend university many years ago. My Dad passed in 1984 and she never remarried. She loved him dearly and stated that she could never marry again. She was fiercely independent, raising three boys without a father. I know it was hard for her. I look back on those days and never felt like we missed out on anything. She provided for us always. Now it's our turn to return the favour. 

Little Changes

She was always articulate and clever but starting just a few years ago, we began to notice little changes. We'd notice them and then dismiss as her being tired, distracted, or overworked. In conversation, this once agile sharp-as-a-tack communicator would lose focus, miss the point, and drift mentally. She might blurt out something delayed or at inappropriate times. Large gatherings and family dinners became difficult for her. She was unable to keep up with conversation. She became forgetful, which was very odd for her. She was easily confused or distracted. Mom began neglecting her own needs, she rarely ate, became withdrawn, and (for a woman who was always active and energetic) began to spend her days at home watching endless television. When she began falling, that's when we knew something was definitely not right. 

She tripped on a sidewalk when she was out with my brother's family, breaking her arm. Another fall later and another broken bone. Then one night as she planned to head out for the evening with her neighbour, she missed the bottom step and fell hard onto the driveway pavement, breaking her hip. She laid in pain on the cold asphalt between her car and the garage door, hidden from view. The only reason she didn't die freezing to death that evening is because her neighbour soon came looking for her and called an ambulance. She was rushed to hospital where she underwent surgery and stayed there in recovery for 3 months. When she recovered, we arranged in-home care to be in place for her as she was sent home. This was a great help but she never felt that she needed it and often sent them away. It was a routine argument - us trying to make sure she was cared for and her sending them away. Her mental deterioration was progressing just as her physical mobility was improving. 

Risky Behaviors

She was making risky choices. Frequently climbing up and down the steep stairs into the basement, wandering around the back yard, etc. She confused easily. Her eyesight was increasingly poor. We fought to have her assessed and did not feel she was safe at home but her doctors disagreed. We figured out a system and she had several months of progress, eventually getting most of her mobility back. This was an amazing feat, but given my Mom's stubbornness, not surprising to anyone who knew her. Unfortunately her physical progress was inversely matching her mental decline. 

And she was still driving. A condition that rightfully gave all of us in the family a great deal of concern. On a bright sunny day, while running errands in the next town with her neighbour, the same one who saved her earlier when she broke her hip, she missed seeing a road construction flag man and plowed into a column of stopped cars. Both her and her passenger were rushed to hospital with facial and leg injuries. The occupants of the car she hit also ended up in hospital. Mom badly broke her foot and was in hospital again for another 3 months. Thankfully her car was no longer drivable and was sent to salvage. We fought the system once more to try and have her assessed but now it was in the early days of the pandemic and the system was under incredible strain. There were no beds to spare. They sent her home again. 

We reinstated her in home care, arranged deliveries of groceries, heating oil etc. - took turns visiting every weekend to check-in on her, help with bills, maintenance, and to make sure she had what she needed. This went on for several more months. People in the community also checked in on her, brought her food, provided company. She was well cared for. But she continued to decline mentally. Dementia is cruel. It robs a person of who they are. She no longer knew who she was or where she was in space and time, often reverting back to her early childhood. She could no longer function, look after herself, pay bills, etc. She was so vulnerable.

Into Residential Care

Just before Christmas of 2021, we received a call from her minister who had been speaking to her on the phone. She sounded "very off" he said - almost intoxicated, which would be very unusual as she did not drink. We spoke with her and being very concerned, ended up arranging another ambulance. My brother scrambled down to see her and we found out later that she’d had a mini stroke, a TIA. She was doing ok overall and the stroke did not leave her paralyzed or otherwise further incapacitated, but it greatly accentuated her dementia and confusion. Back in hospital they once again tried sending her home after she was assessed – that same night! 

My brother and I once again fought this confused, strained, Kafkaesque system and finally prevailed. She was assessed, deemed mentally incompetent, and placed on a waitlist for residential care. She stayed in transition in hospital until a space opened up for her. The time in transitional care was difficult for her. She became quiet and paranoid, thinking anything she heard or saw was directly related to our family and feeling like the system was coming after her. Thankfully after a couple of months and a whole lot of headache and heartache, we were able to move her into a nice residential care facility (RCF) with 24-hour care attendants that is located close to both my brother and I where we now see her every week. 

Dealing With the Aftermath

We worked for weeks over that spring and summer after she moved into the RCF to pack up her home (our childhood home) and ready it for sale. This was a grueling process but overall rewarding as we discovered all sorts of wonderful ephemera from our parents’ early lives together. Mom didn’t throw out anything of Dad’s. It was difficult but worthwhile getting to know him better by discovering interesting snippets of his life, Mom's early life that we didn’t know as well, and their early lives together. 

She is safe now and emotionally happy. The paranoia is gone, leaving a pleasant childlike wonder. She doesn't really communicate anymore, often just repeating back what she hears from others. But I know she understands some of what's going on and is genuinely happy. The heart-wrenching aspect of this illness is its slow, gradual separation of our loved ones from us. It's not just the individual afflicted by the disease who endures its effects; it also erodes the dignity of those it touches. I think she still remembers who I am but it doesn’t really matter if not. She still smiles when she sees me, even with my mask (yes those are back) and beard. She mostly lives in a jumbled misty time of her childhood on the farm as a little girl. That sounds pretty great to me. Music, especially the old hymns and Cape Breton fiddle music, make her happy. Our job now is to make sure her remaining days are as comfortable as we can for her. ∎

I've been a pretty heavy user of social media since 2007, initially with facebook, but twitter really became my online home for many years. Now, in late 2023, the exodus from social media is very apparent. As many users partially or entirely disconnect from the big platforms, I've lost touch with lots of fun and interesting people. People are reevaluating their reliance on social media and considering the toll it takes on their well-being. The mass departure highlights the growing disillusionment with these platforms and the negative impacts they all have on our mental health and our ability to communicate effectively. I used to be part of several vibrant circles on twitter, with a fantastic group of online friends in the early to mid 2010s. But twitter, now X, is a ghost town today. Like an empty room with echoes of past interactions. 

I recently joined Bluesky to check it out. It's quiet too, like an early twitter. Clunky with simple features but also very few brands, no ads, trolls, scams, or spam - at least not yet that I can see. But the discourse there isn't like early twitter. We've all brought our baggage with us it seems. Still endless intentionally polarizing "if you think/say/do [thing], you are terrible" type takes and posts about how messed up our world is, but that's social media now. It has significantly altered the way we all think and communicate - and not for the better. The toxicity that permeates interactions online has seeped into our collective consciousness, shaping how we perceive the world and interact with one another. So, the exodus becomes a form of self-preservation - a conscious effort to escape the pull of an environment that thrives on division and sensationalism.

Many people are returning to the simplicity and authenticity that defined the early days of the internet. Personal websites and blogs, overshadowed for years by the bright lure of social media, are now experiencing a comeback. The benefit of a personal site or blog approach lies in the capacity to provide a curated, intimate space for personal self-expression. Unlike the noise of social media, personal sites allow people to craft narratives free from the constraints of algorithmic preferences and the divisive culture that plagues mainstream platforms. Users regain control over their digital identity, developing a deeper connection with their audience.

The resurgence of personal blogs signals a shift towards a more decentralized digital landscape. Rather than relying on a centralized platform to share content, users are embracing the autonomy that comes with managing their own sites. This movement mirrors the early days of the web, where people had the freedom to shape their online presence without the interference of corporate algorithms. To me, this shift is a counter-narrative to the prevailing discourse of social media. It is a deliberate choice to prioritize quality over quantity, depth over superficiality.

Can we break free from the ingrained habits and patterns that social media has instilled in us? Can we foster a healthier, more meaningful online discourse, one that prioritizes connection over confrontation? It seems to me the social media exodus is not just a departure; it's more of a call to action - a chance to redefine the way we engage with digital platforms and, ultimately, with each other. ∎

The recent decision by the Supreme Court of Canada regarding the constitutionality of the Impact Assessment Act (IAA) is a significant development in the field of federal environmental assessment in Canada. This decision underscores the federal government's role in environmental assessment while emphasizing the necessity of respecting provincial jurisdiction. It is anticipated to instigate modifications in the Act to ensure that it aligns with constitutional requirements, ultimately reshaping the landscape of federal environmental assessment in Canada for years to come. This ruling does not immediately nullify the Act; however, it carries significant weight and is traditionally considered binding by the government. As a result, it triggers a legal and policy process that will require the federal government to reevaluate and adjust the Act to ensure its compliance with the Constitution and to establish a more balanced approach that respects provincial authority in environmental assessment.

Environmental assessment in Canada is a complex process that involves evaluating the environmental and social impacts of various resource and infrastructure projects. The IAA, enacted in 2019, was designed to provide a framework for assessing these impacts, taking into consideration environmental protection, Indigenous rights, and broader public interests. The "designated projects" scheme within the Act was a subject of contention. It allowed certain projects to be specified in regulations or subject to ministerial orders, bypassing a case-by-case evaluation. This aspect was criticized for potentially eroding the role of provinces in decision-making regarding environmental assessments.

The Supreme Court found this aspect to be unconstitutional, underlining that it encroached upon provincial jurisdiction. However, the decision did acknowledge that other sections of the Act dealing with projects conducted or financed by federal authorities on federal lands or outside Canada were constitutional. This ruling has wide implications for both the federal government's authority in environmental assessment and the role of provincial governments in this process, for example:

Federal Overreach and Constitutional Limits

The court's ruling emphasizes that the federal government had exceeded its constitutional authority in certain aspects of the Act. In particular, the "designated projects" scheme, which covers projects specified in regulations or subject to ministerial orders, was declared unconstitutional. This implies that the federal government must revisit and amend these sections of the legislation to bring them in line with the Constitution.

Reinforcement of Provincial Jurisdiction

One of the pivotal takeaways from this decision is the affirmation of provincial rights in the context of environmental assessment. The Constitution Act of 1867 grants provinces jurisdiction over areas related to activities primarily regulated by provincial legislatures. The Supreme Court's ruling underscores the vital role that provinces play in shaping and overseeing environmental assessment processes within their own jurisdictions.

Necessity of Collaborative Approaches

In light of the court's decision, the federal government must engage in extensive collaboration with provincial authorities to formulate a revised, constitutionally compliant approach to environmental assessment. This approach should strike a balance between the federal and provincial levels of government, respecting the legitimate interests and responsibilities of both in evaluating environmental and social impacts of projects.

Legal Clarity and Boundaries

This ruling provides much-needed legal clarity in a domain that has been characterized by debates and uncertainty. It delineates the boundaries of federal jurisdiction in environmental assessment, offering a framework that will guide federal impact assessment for the foreseeable future.

Impact on Ongoing Projects

The decision is anticipated to have implications for the 23 projects currently undergoing the federal impact assessment process under the Act. These projects will likely require adjustments to their assessment and approval processes to align with the court's ruling. This could lead to potential delays, additional scrutiny, or revisions in the projects' plans to ensure compliance with the revised legislative framework.

Reactions have been diverse. Some view it as a protective measure for provincial rights, ensuring that provinces have a say in environmental assessments conducted within their boundaries. Others see it as a setback to environmental protection legislation, arguing that it might hinder the federal government's ability to regulate and assess certain projects effectively. 

The decision highlights the need for a more balanced approach to federal environmental assessment in Canada, recognizing the roles and responsibilities of both the federal and provincial governments. It is expected to drive adjustments in the Act to align it with constitutional requirements and has set a precedent that will shape the future of federal impact assessment in the country. The impact on ongoing projects and the broader environmental assessment landscape in Canada will hopefully become clearer as the federal government works to ensure compliance with the court's ruling and foster a more collaborative and constitutionally sound approach to environmental assessment. ∎

Mining projects are often managed by small, specialized teams responsible for planning and strategizing. Contractors and consultants get brought in to provide specific services within their defined scopes. This compartmentalized approach made sense in a simpler mining landscape. Over the last several years, the mining industry has witnessed ground-shifting developments. These changes are driven by a combination of factors, including evolving environmental regulations, uncertain economic realities, the rise of green energy, logistical challenges, and the complexities of mine financing. These dynamics have created a new reality for the industry - one that requires a more integrated and holistic approach.

The Need for a Holistic Approach

Today, mining operations must navigate a web of regulatory requirements, environmental considerations, and community engagement. This demands a broader perspective that goes beyond extracting minerals from the ground. The world's increasing focus on sustainability and green energy has placed additional pressure on the industry and mines are now expected to contribute to a cleaner and more sustainable future. This shift has implications for how mining projects are planned and executed.

Logistics and supply chain considerations play a role in this transformation. As mines are often located in remote areas, efficient transportation of resources and products to market becomes a critical success factor. This, in turn, necessitates closer collaboration between mining companies, logistics providers, and other stakeholders.

The Approach in Action

So, what does this holistic approach to mining mean, and how does it differ from the traditional model? It's about viewing a mining project as a complete system rather than a collection of isolated scopes. It means fostering ongoing communication and collaboration between various groups involved in a mining project. Breaking down the barriers between different departments - from geologists and engineers to environmental specialists and financial analysts; each group should contribute to a unified vision and strategy for the entire project.

This approach looks at co-designing and co-planning to de-risk the project as a whole. For example, it means that environmental considerations are integrated into the earliest stages of project planning, not as an afterthought. It means that logistics and supply chain experts work closely with mining engineers to optimize transportation routes and minimize costs.

A more holistic approach to mining offers various advantages:

• By addressing potential issues from the earliest planning stages, the project can identify and mitigate risks more effectively. This proactive approach can save both time and money over the life of a project.

• Integrating various aspects of a project leads to increased efficiency. For example, by optimizing supply chain logistics early, mining companies can reduce transportation costs and improve overall project economics.

• Sustainability is increasingly important. A holistic approach allows mining projects to incorporate these practices from the beginning, minimizing environmental impacts while building strong, progressive relationships with Indigenous and local communities.

The mining industry is always evolving with new technologies and market dynamics regularly emerging. A holistic approach enables projects to readily adapt to changing circumstances and take advantage of new opportunities.

Integrating Holistic Practices

There are steps that mining companies can consider to integrate holistic management practices into their operations. 

• Conduct a comprehensive assessment of the operations to identify areas where holistic management practices can be integrated. This assessment should consider social, ecological, and economic factors and involve all stakeholders.

• Develop a management plan that outlines the goals, objectives, and strategies for integrating holistic management practices into the mining operation. This plan should be developed in collaboration with all stakeholders and should be adaptive to changing conditions.

• Implement digitalization and automation to improve and integrate operational processes in the industry.

• Adopt a holistic approach to post-mining management that considers the related risks and opportunities and sets up an appropriate risk management as well as a comprehensive monitoring system.

• Integrate industrial ecology thinking into waste management. A more preventive and recovery-oriented approach to waste management, integrated into mine planning and operations, could be both economically attractive and environmentally beneficial.

• Monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the holistic management practices and adjust the plan as needed. This may involve collecting data on social, ecological, and economic factors and using this data to inform decision-making.

Looking Ahead 

Integrating holistic management practices into mining operations requires a comprehensive assessment, a holistic management plan, implementation, and monitoring & evaluation. It involves a collaborative approach that considers social, ecological, and economic factors and aims to manage mining operations in a way that is sustainable and regenerative.

Ultimately, the goal of any mining project is to reach production successfully. Projects that embrace a holistic approach are better positioned to achieve this goal, avoiding endless studies and delays. The days of treating mining projects as a series of separate scopes are coming to a close. Instead, successful projects will be those that recognize the interconnectedness of various aspects of mining and embrace a more integrated and collaborative approach. ∎

Nova Scotia's path to harnessing its offshore wind energy resource represents a vital step in combating climate change and transitioning towards sustainable, clean energy sources. Experience in the conventional energy sector has produced a wealth of expertise, infrastructure, and valuable lessons that can benefit the developing offshore wind industry. 

Workforce, Regulatory Framework, and Innovation

I spent much of my career working in the offshore industry here in Nova Scotia, from the initial environmental surveys near Goldboro and on Sable Island, first gas at both Sable and Deep Panuke, through to decommissioning of those gas fields. This is an industry that knows how to work in the challenging environments of the Scotian Shelf and the skilled workforce and technical expertise trained in the conventional offshore sector can be readily transferred to the offshore wind industry. Engineers, technicians, and project managers possess valuable experience in offshore operations, safety protocols, and project management. This knowledge transfer accelerates the learning curve for offshore wind projects and enhances safety and efficiency.

The conventional offshore industry has provided Nova Scotia with an established regulatory framework for offshore activities. This framework encompasses safety standards, environmental assessments, and permitting processes. Nova Scotia recognizes the need for an updated regulatory regime tailored to offshore wind energy. Ensuring a streamlined and efficient permitting process is important for timely project approvals and minimizing economic costs. Adapting and expanding this regulatory regime to accommodate offshore wind energy demonstrates a pragmatic approach, ensuring that the industry operates within established guidelines and standards.

The physical and locational challenges faced by both offshore gas and wind in Nova Scotia are very similar. These include harsh weather conditions, marine logistics, and environmental considerations. As Nova Scotia switches towards offshore wind, there's a unique opportunity for cross-industry collaboration. Innovations in technology, such as remote monitoring, safety protocols, and environmental impact assessments, can be shared and adapted, leading to more efficient and eco-friendly operations.

Attracting Industry 

To reach its renewable energy goals, Nova Scotia must continue to attract the offshore wind industry to the region. This involves creating an environment conducive to investment, innovation, and long-term commitment. Nova Scotia is actively seeking ways to achieve this goal, working closely with industry stakeholders to encourage growth and development. For example, the province has released an offshore wind stakeholder engagement plan that reviews and summarizes best practices and lessons learned from offshore wind stakeholder engagement in the US Northeast market. 

Locally, Nova Scotia's offshore wind industry will be developed in consultation with fishers, First Nations, and other stakeholders and the province is reviewing provisions in its Marine Renewable-Energy Act to designate an "Area of Marine Renewable Energy Priority" for offshore wind in Nova Scotia's nearshore. An offshore wind roadmap was recently released that outlines potential routes to market for offshore wind energy. The roadmap says that offshore wind development will be jointly managed by the federal and provincial governments, which are busy creating a regime to oversee the arrival of offshore wind turbines. 

Other examples include the Strait of Canso Offshore Wind Task Force - a partnership between the Cape Breton Partnership and the Municipality of the District of Guysborough that is working to identify opportunities and challenges related to offshore wind development in the Strait of Canso. And very recently, Nova East Wind Inc, a joint venture between DP Energy and SBM Offshore, was established to develop Canada's first offshore wind farm off Goldboro, Nova Scotia. 

Navigating Challenges

One of the bigger hurdles Nova Scotia needs to overcome is ensuring sufficient capacity within the supply chain and transmission network. The supply chain includes the manufacturing, construction, and installation of wind turbines and their components, as well as the operation and maintenance of wind farms. The transmission network refers to the infrastructure that delivers the electricity generated by wind turbines to the grid and ultimately to consumers. In Nova Scotia, the existing transmission network may not have the capacity to handle the additional electricity generated by offshore wind turbines. This could lead to the need for upgrades to the transmission infrastructure, which could delay the development of offshore wind projects. In addition, the supply chain for offshore wind is still developing, and there may be limited capacity to manufacture and install turbines and their components. This could result in higher costs for developers and longer lead times for project development. 

The government of Nova Scotia is working to address these challenges by attracting the offshore wind industry to build wind farms off Nova Scotia's coast and expanding the mandate of the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board to include the regulation of offshore renewable energy. Establishing a robust infrastructure is essential to support the development and transmission of energy from offshore wind farms. This requires close collaboration between government, industry stakeholders, and investors.

The shift from gas to offshore wind aligns with the global transition towards cleaner energy sources. By diversifying the energy portfolio, Nova Scotia reduces its dependence on carbon-based energy while embracing sustainable alternatives. This aligns with the province's climate change goals and buffers the region from the economic volatility associated with the oil and gas industry. ∎

Nova Scotia's history of marine technological innovation is rooted in its maritime heritage. With a strategic location along the Atlantic Ocean, the province has developed a strong ecosystem of marine research and technological development. Early modern innovators include world-class research institutions like the Bedford Institute of Oceanography (BIO) that pioneered oceanographic research. Over the years, Nova Scotia's ocean tech sector has evolved, expanding into various subfields, including marine robotics, underwater acoustics, and environmental monitoring. 

The province serves as an ocean hub with active industries such as the Royal Canadian Navy and defense, ocean research and technology, mariculture, tech incubation, marine architecture and shipbuilding, and it's a gateway to the arctic and a major container port for North America. Its ocean tech industry is currently experiencing strong growth but still faces its share of obstacles. 

Some of the key challenges confronting this industry include:

• Labour issues - Finding skilled workers is a pressing issue for the marine technology sector, and it's not unique to Nova Scotia. A significant labour gap exists, hampering growth potential. Despite the sector's growth, the labour shortage is a bottle neck that has been present for years. This shortage is a challenge for the industry and is hindering its ability to expand and deliver new technologies to global markets. This gap is caused by several factors, including a lack of skilled workers, low graduation rates, loss of skilled workers as experienced personnel leave or retire, competition with other industries, and gaps in government funding and support.

• Operational scaling - While many ocean tech businesses in Nova Scotia are successful and profitable, most have yet to reach their full potential. Scaling operations is important for long-term growth. 

• Adapting to the changing climate - Nova Scotia's ocean tech sector is impacted by the effects of climate change and ocean acidification, posing risks to fisheries and mariculture. The industry must prioritize the development of innovative technologies that can help mitigate these effects. By doing so, it will play a pivotal role in safeguarding local ecosystems.

Despite these challenges, Nova Scotia's ocean tech sector has a robust local supply chain, producing a wide variety of specialized products. To develop growth, the industry should continue to focus on strategies such as:

• Investing in education and training - To overcome this hurdle, the industry must invest in education and training programs aimed at attracting and retaining talent, encourage youth participation, and foster an environment of inclusion and diversity. By offering specialized training and educational opportunities, the industry can attract a skilled workforce. Collaborating with local educational institutions can be a valuable step in this direction.

• Forging strategic partnerships - Building alliances with other sectors, such as clean energy, can unlock synergies and accelerate growth. Collaborative efforts can lead to the development of innovative solutions and the creation of new market opportunities. To achieve this, companies need to explore partnerships with other industries to leverage resources and expand their reach, lobby for increased government support, participate in funding programs, and invest in training and education.

• Embracing innovation - Continued innovation is essential to staying competitive in the global market. Encouraging research and development within the industry can yield solutions to both current and future challenges. Companies that develop technologies that meet the needs of the global markets do so by investing in research and development to create highly innovative products that are in high demand.

Examples of local organizations and agencies that are working on solving these issues include:

• Ocean Technology Council of Nova Scotia - a non-profit organization that represents the ocean technology sector in Nova Scotia

• Invest Nova Scotia (formerly Nova Scotia Business Inc) - a provincial government agency that works to attract investment and support business growth in Nova Scotia

• Centre For Ocean Ventures And Entrepreneurship (COVE) - a significant incubator organization in Nova Scotia's ocean tech sector. It is a collaborative facility for applied innovation in the ocean sector, located in Halifax. The Centre provides a space for ocean tech companies to work together and develop new products and services. It has a range of facilities, including office space, workshops, and testing tanks. COVE is an important player in Nova Scotia's ocean tech sector, providing a space for collaboration and innovation.

• Ocean Startup Challenge - provides funding and support to teams building innovation solutions to ocean industry challenges.

• Sustainable Oceans Applied Research - promotes sustainable ocean practices and research and are working to implement education and training programs in the sector.

The province's innovation in the sector has resulted in groundbreaking technologies that are now used globally. With a strong emphasis on sustainability and environmental stewardship, Nova Scotia stands as a prominent player in the ocean tech industry, shaping the future of marine exploration, conservation, and resource management. By addressing labour issues, scaling operations, and tackling climate change issues head-on, the industry can progress and contribute to the region's economic and environmental well-being. ∎

I have been working over, on, or under the sea since the earliest stages of my career. My home province - Nova Scotia - is intricately linked to the ocean and wind and its maritime history is woven with shipbuilding, fishing, sailing, and ocean-going trade. The landscape and rugged coastline provided both challenges and opportunities for seafarers, influencing ship design, navigation techniques, and trade routes. Harnessing the wind facilitated trade between Atlantic Canada and other regions - laying the foundation for development of maritime industries that continue to play a vital role in the region's culture and economy today. 

As the region embraces wind energy, this historical connection between wind and the sea takes on a new dimension, marking a transition from reliance on wind for navigation to harnessing its power for sustainable energy generation. Nova Scotia especially is taking proactive steps towards taking advantage of its abundant offshore wind resources. 

Government Initiatives and Policy Framework

The commitment of the Nova Scotia government to promote offshore wind energy is a significant driver behind the growth of the sector. The province plans to offer leases for 5 gigawatts of offshore wind energy by 2030, with a first call for bids by 2025. This reflects the province's dedication to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and signals a shift towards sustainable economic development. This commitment is complemented by the federal government's introduction of regulatory amendments to facilitate the development of offshore wind farms in Atlantic Canada. These policy changes create a conducive environment for investment and innovation in the sector.

A unique aspect of the regulatory landscape in Atlantic Canada's offshore wind energy sector is the assignment of regulatory authority to jointly managed offshore boards. This collaborative approach involves both federal and provincial authorities working together to oversee the development of offshore wind projects. This framework ensures that projects adhere to environmental standards, maintain ecosystem health, and consider the interests of various stakeholders. Such collaboration is important for fostering responsible and balanced growth in the sector.

Timeline and Prospects

The timeline for the development of offshore wind energy in Atlantic Canada is ambitious but achievable. With the first offshore wind leases expected to be offered by 2025, the region could see the first wind turbines turning in its waters by the end of the decade. This progress is a testament to the collaborative efforts of governments, industry stakeholders, and environmental advocates. As the sector gains momentum, it opens up opportunities for job creation, technological innovation, and economic growth in the region.

While there are currently no operational offshore wind projects in Canada, the prospects for growth in this sector are highly promising. The global trend towards renewable energy, coupled with the abundant wind resources in Atlantic Canada, positions the region for substantial growth in offshore wind energy. This growth will contribute to energy diversification and also enhance energy security, reduce reliance on carbon-based fuels, and mitigate the impacts of climate change.

Identification of Suitable Development Areas

Before initiating a call for bids, authorities in Atlantic Canada will carefully identify areas that are suitable for offshore wind energy development, conservation, or fishing. This strategic approach helps strike a balance between energy generation and environmental preservation. The identification of appropriate zones for development minimizes conflicts between different ocean uses and ensures that offshore wind farms are located in areas with minimal impact on marine ecosystems and local communities.

Role in US Offshore Wind

In addition to our own sector growth, the strategic proximity of Atlantic Canada to New England's developing offshore wind projects holds broader industry promise for both regions. As the US accelerates its adoption of offshore wind energy, the Jones Act, which mandates the use of American-built and operated vessels for domestic maritime commerce, presents a challenge for their industry's growth. This is where Atlantic Canada's well-established maritime expertise and supply chain efficiencies come into play. The region's heritage and experience position it as a natural partner for the US offshore wind sector. With shared waters, Nova Scotia serves as a hub for supplying the necessary components and services, benefiting both economies while adhering to the Jones Act regulations. This collaboration showcases the potential for trans-border cooperation and demonstrates how historical ties and regional strengths can fuel the renewable energy transition in a sustainable and mutually beneficial manner.

Regional Benefits

Wind energy has several benefits for the region, including environmental, economic, and social advantages. In Nova Scotia, every megawatt of wind energy can reduce the province's greenhouse gas emissions by as much as 2,500 tonnes per year. Currently 12% of Nova Scotia's electricity comes from renewable sources, wind energy will diversify energy supplies away from traditional reliance on carbon-based generating plants. 

Wind is a key component of Nova Scotia's renewable energy targets and the province aims to generate 80% of its electricity from renewable sources by 2030. New wind energy projects in the province will provide clean power to approximately 350,000 homes, create hundreds of jobs, and generate millions of dollars in economic activity. Offshore wind energy is expected to play a significant role in achieving this goal.

Atlantic Canada's commitment to harnessing wind resources for clean energy production presents a unique opportunity for economic development while prioritizing environmental sustainability. As the sector gains momentum, it is important for all stakeholders to actively engage with the developments, identify potential challenges & opportunities, and contribute towards responsible and sustainable growth. 

It's an exciting and challenging time for the region. I'm glad to be part of it working with a company that is providing environmental guidance to this developing industry and seeing some of my former clients retool their organizations to work in this sector, bringing their substantial expertise to implement these important projects. By embracing the potential of offshore wind energy, Atlantic Canada can chart an international course towards a greener and more resilient energy future. ∎

Recently, I was involved in the management of the environmental assessment process for a proposed wind farm in Atlantic Canada. Wind energy is an important part of the renewable energy mix and vital to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and combating climate change. Conducting the EA in parallel with the engineering design is a common, yet complex and challenging process as the layouts and design are often not formalized early enough in the overall process. 

Integration of Environmental and Engineering Teams

The first challenge is ensuring that the EA process is integrated with the engineering design process. Collaboration between the EA team and the engineering team is essential. One way to address this challenge is to establish a multidisciplinary team that includes experts from both the environmental and engineering fields. Regular meetings between the teams will ensure that the engineering design and the EA process are properly aligned.

Identification and Assessment of Environmental Impacts

The second challenge is the potential for conflicts between environmental protection and energy production. Wind farms can have negative impacts on the environment, such as habitat fragmentation, bird and bat mortality, and noise pollution. A science-based approach must be used to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of the wind farm. This involves assessing the project's potential impacts on wildlife, vegetation, water quality, and other environmental factors. Mitigation measures should be identified and implemented to minimize any negative impacts. The project should also be designed in a way that avoids or minimizes environmental impacts to the extent possible.

Stakeholder Engagement

The third challenge is public perception and stakeholder engagement. Even though they are green energy wind farms can be controversial to some - with concerns about visual impact, noise, and potential impacts on property values. Effective stakeholder engagement is important to address these concerns early and ensure the project is developed in a socially responsible and sustainable manner. This includes conducting public consultations, holding open houses, and providing project information through a variety of channels, including traditional media, social media, and the web.

Schedule and Cost

In addition to these challenges, conducting the EA during the engineering design process will have schedule and cost considerations. It is important to keep these in mind to ensure that the project stays on track and within budget. The EA process can be time-consuming. Certain field assessments often need to occur during specific seasonal windows which may not be in sync with the engineering design schedule. Missing these windows may require revisiting the site to reassess the following season. This can lead to delays in overall project schedule and increase the project's overall cost. 

To address this, it's important to plan for the EA process early in the project by allocating design resources up front to the selection of equipment and the determination of layout. Or to build in optionality in the assessment so that minor changes later will not involve significant rework during the assessment process. 

Specialized Expertise

Another challenge is that the EA process requires specialized expertise and resources, which can increase the project's overall cost. For example, the project may require the services of environmental consultants, wildlife biologists, and other experts to assess potential environmental impacts. To address this challenge, it's important to budget for these resources early in the project and work with experienced experts.

Conducting environmental assessments in parallel with the engineering design presents unique challenges. These can be overcome through a multidisciplinary team approach, a science-based evaluation of potential environmental impacts, effective stakeholder engagement, and compliance with relevant regulations. By considering these challenges early and planning for them in collaboration with the greater project teams, your projects can move forward successfully. ∎

As a consultant working in the renewable energy industry, I have seen firsthand the strides that have been made in recent years to promote sustainability and environmental stewardship. From advances in solar and wind technology to innovative approaches to energy storage and distribution, the renewable energy industry is leading the charge in the transition to a more sustainable future.

But while these technological advances are critical to achieving our sustainability goals, they are only part of the equation. True sustainability transformation requires a fundamental shift in the way we think about energy production and consumption, and the impact it has on our planet.

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)

This is where ESG reporting comes in. ESG stands for Environmental, Social, and Governance, and refers to the key factors that investors and stakeholders use to evaluate a company's sustainability performance. By reporting on these factors, companies can provide a transparent and comprehensive view of their sustainability practices, and demonstrate their commitment to creating long-term value for both shareholders and society as a whole.

ESG reporting has become increasingly important in the renewable energy industry as investors and consumers alike become more conscious of the impact that their energy choices have on the environment. But it's not just about meeting regulatory requirements or appealing to a particular market segment - it's about creating a sustainable business model that is resilient to the challenges of the 21st century.

For example, a company that prioritizes sustainability in its business strategy will be better equipped to deal with the physical risks of climate change, such as extreme weather events or supply chain disruptions. By reducing its carbon footprint and investing in renewable energy sources, it can also mitigate the transition risks associated with the shift away from fossil fuels.

Opportunities

ESG reporting is an opportunity to showcase the positive impact that a company is having on the environment and society. By measuring and reporting on its social and environmental impact, a company can demonstrate its commitment to sustainable development and stakeholder engagement, and build trust with its customers and investors.

A company that invests in community outreach programs or supports local environmental initiatives can build a positive reputation and differentiate itself from competitors. By reporting on these activities, it can demonstrate the tangible benefits that it is bringing to society, and create a sense of purpose and shared values among its stakeholders.

Challenges

But ESG reporting is not without its challenges. One of the biggest obstacles is the lack of standardization and transparency in reporting practices. Without a common framework for measuring and reporting on ESG factors, it can be difficult for investors and stakeholders to compare performance across companies, and to make informed decisions about where to allocate their resources.

To address this challenge, a number of initiatives have been launched in recent years to promote standardization and transparency in ESG reporting. For example, the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) has developed industry-specific standards for reporting on sustainability performance, while the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) has developed a framework for reporting on climate-related risks and opportunities.

By adopting standards and frameworks, companies can provide more meaningful and comparable information about their sustainability performance, and enable investors and stakeholders to make more informed decisions about where to allocate their resources. ∎

I've been managing increasingly complex projects in one form or another for over 25 years now. Project management can be a daunting task for anyone, especially for those who are not trained in the field. However, there are several project management tips that can help even non-project managers to run successful projects. 

Here are five essential project management tips that can be applied to any project, regardless of size or complexity.

1. Encourage clear and effective communication

Communication is the key to the success of any project. As a project manager, it is your responsibility to ensure that all team members understand their roles and responsibilities, the project objectives, and the timeline. Clear communication ensures that everyone is on the same page and has a shared understanding of the project goals.

To foster clear communication, it is essential to establish regular check-ins and status updates, whether through email, instant messaging, or other communication channels. It is also important to be available and approachable, so team members can ask questions and get clarifications as needed.

2. Set clear goals for your project

One of the critical project management tips is setting clear goals for your project. This involves defining the project's scope, objectives, and deliverables. Without clear goals, it is challenging to track progress and measure success. It is also essential to set realistic and achievable goals that align with the project's resources and timeline.

To set clear goals, it is important to involve all stakeholders, including team members, clients, and any other relevant parties. This ensures that everyone has a shared understanding of the project's goals and can work towards achieving them.

3. Choose & use the right tools to monitor progress

Project management tools are essential for monitoring progress and tracking project milestones. They can help keep team members on track and ensure that tasks are completed on time. Some of the essential project management tools include Gantt charts, project management software, and other productivity tools.

When choosing project management tools, it is important to consider the needs of the project and the team members. The tools should be user-friendly and easy to navigate, and they should support collaboration and communication.

4. Work with a flexible team whose skills combine well

A successful project requires a team whose skills and experience complement each other. As a project manager, it is your responsibility to ensure that you have the right people on your team. This involves identifying team members' strengths and weaknesses and assigning roles and responsibilities accordingly.

It is also essential to foster a culture of collaboration and teamwork. This involves creating an environment where team members feel comfortable sharing their ideas and opinions, and where everyone feels valued and respected.

5. Keep your project team members motivated as best you can

Motivation is essential for ensuring that team members remain focused and committed to the project. As a project manager, it is your responsibility to keep team members motivated throughout the project. This involves recognizing and rewarding their efforts and achievements and providing support and encouragement when needed.

To keep team members motivated, it is important to set realistic and achievable goals, provide regular feedback and support, and recognize team members' contributions. It is also essential to create a positive and supportive work environment, where team members feel valued and appreciated.

Project management can be challenging, but with the right tips, even non-PMs can run successful projects. By fostering clear and effective communication, setting clear goals, choosing and using the right tools to monitor progress, working with a flexible team whose skills combine well, and keeping your team members motivated, you can ensure that your project runs smoothly and achieves its objectives. ∎

Our lack of confidence is not the result of difficulty. The difficulty comes from our lack of confidence - Seneca

~~~~~~~~~~

In today's increasingly complicated and uncertain world, self-confidence is a quality that empowers us to succeed in both our personal and professional circles. While many philosophies and approaches can help us boost self-assurance, there are a number of timeless principles that go beyond specific philosophies. In this short post, I highlight some of the key principles that can help anyone build self-confidence, offering practical insights that can be applied to daily life.

Focus on What You Can Control

One very important lesson for building self-confidence is to concentrate on those aspects of life that are within your control. Much of the harm done to ourselves through worry and stress comes from focusing on things that we have no control over. Direct your energy to managing your thoughts, attitudes, and actions - all items that are within your control. By doing so, you will cultivate a sense of agency and empowerment, regardless of external circumstances. This newfound sense of control over your inner world can significantly boost your self-assuredness.

Act in Accordance with Your Values

Another principle for building self-confidence is the importance of aligning your actions with your values. Regardless of external opinions or pressures, consistently acting in accordance with your deeply held principles can help you forge a profound sense of self-respect and confidence in your character. Prioritizing your moral compass over external validation empowers you to build a resilient core of self-belief.

Take Control of Your Actions

Low self-esteem often thrives on inaction, procrastination, and unproductive habits. Taking charge of your actions, choosing habits that reflect your values, and actively working towards self-improvement are critical steps. Through deliberate and disciplined action, you can break free from self-doubt and gradually build the self-confidence needed to confront life's challenges head-on.

Embrace Failure

A universal truth is that everyone encounters failure at some point. Building self-confidence involves viewing failure as a valuable opportunity for growth and learning rather than as a reflection of your self-worth. This perspective shift allows you to develop resilience and self-confidence in your ability to overcome setbacks. By acknowledging that failure is a natural part of life, you can approach challenges with a more positive mindset and the confidence to persevere.

Focus on Progress, Not Perfection

I often struggle with this one. Perfectionism can hinder self-confidence - instead, focus on continuous progress. Set achievable goals and concentrate on incremental steps toward self-improvement. This practical approach helps you avoid the fear of falling short and fosters a sense of accomplishment. Recognize that self-confidence is built through progress, not by aiming for unattainable ideals.

Building self-confidence is a goal that can be achieved by applying some timeless principles. By concentrating on what you can control, aligning your actions with your values, taking charge of your behaviors, embracing failure as a learning opportunity, and focusing on progress, you can gradually cultivate unwavering self-assurance. These principles empower you to become a resilient individual who is less influenced by external circumstances and the opinions of others, ultimately leading to a deeper sense of self-confidence that positively impacts every aspect of your life. ∎

Caring for my elderly mother with dementia while maintaining a busy consulting career has been one of the most challenging experiences of my life so far. I've had to juggle my responsibilities as a caregiver while ensuring that my work obligations are met. It can be overwhelming and exhausting, often leading to considerable stress and fatigue. 

Challenges of Caring for a Loved One with Dementia

One of the most significant challenges I've faced is my time management. Balancing my mother's needs with my career obligations has been a constant struggle. It requires careful planning, coordination, and organization to ensure that everything is taken care of. There have been times when I've had to sacrifice my own needs to make sure that my mother is taken care of properly.

Navigating the complexities of medical care can be very kafkaesque, especially here in Nova Scotia during a pandemic. There have been instances where I've had to angrily fight the system to ensure that my mother received the proper care. It has been exhausting and stressful, making it difficult for me to take care of my own self. Thankfully I have two brothers and their families to help out and we have all worked together to share the load. 

Getting her in to proper long term care was such a big relief, and organizing, packing, cleaning, and selling her home (our childhood home) was emotionally draining, physically taxing, and took 4 months of effort. I was very lucky to have all the support of family through this period. 

Things are a bit easier now with her being properly cared for in residential care, and she is much closer to me now so I get to see her more often. Weekly in most cases, whereas I might only have seen her 3 or 4 times a year before. 

Benefits of Caring for a Loved One with Dementia

Despite these challenges, there are benefits to caring for my mother in her dementia. I spend more quality time with her now. And she has a different outlook on things. Dementia has stripped away the complexity of her life, leaving her with a newfound appreciation for the simple things. 

My mother has reverted to an almost childlike sense of wonder and is often more aware of her distant past than she ever was before her diagnosis. As such we are getting all sorts of interesting snippets of her life on the farm in rural Pictou County. Although many of her stories are jumbled together and likely not accurate, it presents a sense of what life was like for her years ago, and emotionally this makes her very happy. 

Over the past couple of years, I've learned how to manage my time, juggle my responsibilities, and navigate a complex, maxed out, and at times uncaring health system. Most importantly, I've had the opportunity to spend time with my mother and create meaningful memories together. While it can be a difficult journey, with patience, dedication, and love, caregivers can successfully balance their careers and other life responsibilities while enjoying the benefits of spending time with a loved one who has a new perspective on life. ∎

Have you ever felt like you're faking it at times in your professional life? If so, you're not alone. Imposter Syndrome is a psychological pattern that causes individuals to doubt their abilities and fear being exposed as frauds, despite evidence of their competence.

Embracing Growth, Resilience, and Self-Acceptance in Your Professional Journey 

As someone who has experienced these feelings, I know how challenging it can be to overcome this sense of doubt and insecurity. Throughout my career, I've often felt like I just fell into certain roles without having the right qualifications or training. I've often had to figure things out on my own without a lot of assistance, and this has caused me to question my abilities and feel like an imposter at times. Recognizing that these feelings are a common experience and having an open conversation with colleagues has often helped me gain perspective. 

It's important to focus on accomplishments and the hard work that led us here. Success is not defined by being an expert in a particular area or never making mistakes. Success is defined by being resilient, persistent, and continuously learning and growing as a professional. Seeking support and guidance from mentors or colleagues is beneficial as they can offer valuable feedback to help us realize that we are not alone in our experiences.

Believe in Yourself as a Professional 

As professionals, we need to be careful not to be too self-deprecating and critical, and to believe the feedback from our team when they acknowledge our contributions and expertise in the field. It's okay to make mistakes and have moments of doubt. Those don't diminish the value of our work or our competence as professionals.

Imposter Syndrome is a common feeling that many professionals experience, but we can overcome this mentality by recognizing our accomplishments, seeking support from colleagues, and focusing on our growth and development as professionals. ∎

As a consultant working in the energy and environmental sectors, I have experienced my fair share of stress in the workplace. The constant demand for high-quality work, long hours, and the pressure to meet deadlines all take a toll on one’s mental and physical health. 

Stress can manifest in a variety of ways, including fatigue, irritability, difficulty concentrating, and physical symptoms such as headaches and muscle tension. By recognizing these signs, you can take steps to manage your stress before it becomes overwhelming.

Take Breaks

One of the best ways to manage stress is to take breaks throughout the day. It's easy to get caught up in your work and forget to take a break, but this can lead to burnout. Instead, try to take a few minutes every hour or so to step away from your work and recharge. You can take a short walk, do some stretching exercises, or simply sit quietly and meditate. 

By taking regular breaks, you can reduce your stress levels and increase your productivity.

Prioritize Your Workload

Another way to manage stress is to prioritize your workload. When you have too much on your plate, it can be tempting to try to do everything at once. However, this can lead to even more stress and a decrease in the quality of your work. Instead, prioritize your tasks and focus on the most important ones first. This will help you feel more in control and reduce your stress levels.

Maintain Work-Life Balance

It's also essential to maintain a healthy work-life balance. When work takes up all of your time and energy, it can be challenging to find time for the things you enjoy outside of work. However, it's important to make time for hobbies, family, and friends. These activities can help you relax and recharge, reducing your stress levels and increasing your overall well-being.

In addition to taking breaks and prioritizing your workload, there are other strategies you can use to manage stress. For example, exercise is an excellent way to reduce stress and improve your overall health. Even a short walk or quick workout can help you feel more energized and focused.

Consider Mindfulness Techniques

Mindfulness is another strategy that can be effective in managing stress. Mindfulness involves focusing your attention on the present moment and accepting your thoughts and feelings without judgment. By practicing mindfulness, you can reduce your stress levels and improve your overall well-being.

Get Support if Too Much 

If you find that your stress levels become overwhelming despite these strategies, it may be time to seek support. Whether it's talking to a colleague, a friend, or a professional counselor, seeking support can help you manage stress and maintain your well-being. Don't be afraid to ask for help when you need it.

Managing stress in your professional life is important for maintaining your obligations and not burning out. By recognizing the signs of stress, taking breaks throughout the day, prioritizing your workload, maintaining a healthy work-life balance, exercising, practicing mindfulness, and reaching out for support, you can effectively manage stress and maintain your overall well-being. 

Remember, managing stress is an ongoing process that requires consistent effort and attention and it's not a one-size-fits-all approach. What works for one person may not work for another. It's essential to find the strategies that work best for you and to make them a regular part of your routine. ∎

This trail located close to my home offers an abundance of natural beauty and beautiful views. The autumn season is a perfect time to explore this area, as the foliage transforms into a vibrant array of colors that accentuates the rugged terrain. The high exposed bedrock ridges, carved by ancient glaciers, create a unique and striking landscape that is characteristic of the granite uplands region of the province. The ridge is covered with trees, including red spruce, jack pine, and tamarack. In autumn, the bright red heathland shrubs add a pop of color to the landscape and create a stunning contrast.

The Tragedy Behind the Name

The history behind the name is tragic and dates back to 1842 when two young girls wandered off, got lost in the forest, and died together of exposure. The sisters (4 and 6), who are often referred to now as the "Babes in the Woods" have left a lasting impression on the local community, and their memory lives on to this day. The cemetery at the Woodlawn United Church is their final resting place, where they are buried together. 

Prepare for the Trail

The trail is a moderate hike, approximately 5k in and out. The difficulty level varies depending on the time of year. It's not an official trail but has been in use for a number of years so it's well-worn and fairly easy to navigate. To access the trailhead, you will need to park your vehicle by the side of the road and walk along the power transmission corridor, which can be a bit tricky. Given the terrain and potential obstacles along the way, good boots are recommended to ensure you can complete the hike comfortably and safely. ∎

I used to have more time to write about the things I enjoy. For a few years I often wrote about heavy music and provided some year-end reviews for my friend Ryan's site over at Here To Destroy

some examples listed here:

My best of 2015 

My best of 2016 

My best of 2017 

I turned 50 this month. Here are 50 lessons I've learned by my 50th birthday. These are mine. Yes yours are different.

1. Life is not fair. Teach that to your kids.

2. That thing that hurts or is bugging you? Get it checked out.

3. People everywhere are all the same. They love their families and their kids and want the best for them.

4. Most people are well intentioned.

5. Most people are ill informed.

6. Everything changes. Usually just when you're finally comfortable.

7. Challenges become the greatest instructors.

8. Expect nothing.

9. Welcome everything. This one is hard.

10. No one owes you anything.

11. You don't owe anyone anything.

12. You really don't know as much as you think you do.

13. You know more than you think you do.

14. You are capable of anything when the right motivations kick in.

15. Make yourself a priority.

16. Walk with your kids in the woods.

17. Wear sunscreen. It's important.

18. Drop toxic emotionally draining people.

19. Fly your own flag. No one else will.

20. Be genuine.

21. Be aware of your own hypocrisy and work to cut it out.

22. You're tougher than you think in the moments that count.

23. You are responsible for your actions. In this current world of external blame, personal accountability is incredibly valuable.

24. Listen to your gut.

25. Pay close attention in moments of true fear. It's your spidey-sense honed by millenia of evolution. It will guide you.

26. Playfully tease your children. It arms them and builds resilience.

27. You control your reactions to external events, they don't control you.

28. Outside is better.

29. Travel away from your cultural experience. It grounds you.

30. Lean on supports when needed.

31. Eat together as a family when you can.

32. Pay attention to both the beauty and the warnings.

33. People betray. Know who you can trust.

34. Aim for understanding and compassion.

35. It's ok if you don't read all those books.

36. Pragmatism kicks idealism in the balls.

37. The approval of others is not always important.

38. You already know what being a good person means. So be it.

39. Buy a waterpik.

40. Collect experiences.

41. You are not invincible. Lifestyle choices have impacts.

42. Help people in need when you can.

43. Take action when others can't or won't.

44. Don't take shit, unless deserved. Then take all of it.

45. Appreciate the small rituals.

46. Admit fault.

47. Forgive yourself.

48. Be your own advocate.

49. No one cares what you used to do. Only what you do.

50. Your word is all you really own. Be careful with it. ∎